Quick question about the gravitational law

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Kevin VD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravitational Law
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the reasoning behind the squared distance term "r" in Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation and Coulomb's Law. Kevin, a physics student, seeks clarity on why gravitational and electrostatic forces diminish with the square of the distance between two point particles. The explanation provided highlights that the force is derived from the properties of integrals and point sources in three-dimensional space, resulting in the formula F = 1/(4πr²) for point particles. The discussion also notes that this relationship is specific to three dimensions, contrasting it with two-dimensional scenarios where the relationship changes to 1/(2πr).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation
  • Familiarity with Coulomb's Law
  • Basic knowledge of calculus, particularly integrals
  • Concept of point particles and fields in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation
  • Learn about Coulomb's Law and its applications in electrostatics
  • Explore the concept of fields and sources in physics
  • Investigate the differences in force laws in different dimensions, particularly 2D vs 3D
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the mathematical foundations of gravitational and electrostatic forces.

Kevin VD
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Aloha fellow forumdwellers,

“Long” time reader, first time poster reporting for duty! Got a small question which I hope you peeps can help me understand (since I'm someone who wants to understand how things work, not just blindly copy it from a notebook). Gonna start my first year of college physics in 4 months, and I've done some reading pure out of interest, but I can't seem to find an answer to my problem:

Why is “r” squared in Newton's Gravitation law (or Coulombs law for that matter)? I've been staring myself almost insane on the representation of 2 attracting particles, and can't find a logical answer to this! Can someone explain me why this is?

With the representation of 2 attracting particles I mean the picture on Wikipedia under Newton's law of universal gravitation.

Cheers,

Kevin o:)


PS: sorry for my bad English, still working on it!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can accept that masses or charged particles create fields. The relationship between the fields they create and the particles themselves is encoded in a simple equation:

\nabla F = \rho

That is, for an arbitrary source of field \rho, it creates a field F whose derivative is the soruce itself. In other words, the field is just the integral of the source.

When that source is a point particle, the solution in 3D follows a specific form.

F_{\text{point}} = \frac{1}{4\pi r^2} \hat r

You've seen this before, of course; it's possible to derive this solution as the point particle solution based on the properties of integrals and point sources. It's interesting to note that the 1/4\pi r^2 part is specific to 3D. In 2D, you get 1/2 \pi r instead. This actually appears in, for example, the electric field of a line charge.

So, really the only thing I've done is tell you that point particles' create very specific fields because that's what the differential equation says, but in doing so, another question arises: why do these laws of physics obey this differential equation at all? That's something I can't answer, and I don't think anyone can.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
978
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
691
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K