Quick question on coupled pendulum kinetic energy

  • Thread starter cmackeen
  • Start date
  • #1
cmackeen
1
0
I have found that the kinetic energy term for each mass on a coupled (by a spring) pendulum has no [itex]\dot{y}[/itex] terms, as in the the masses do not move in the y direction at all. What am I missing here? I know they are connected, but in the first normal mode, both masses should move like regular pendulums. Regular pendulums have a [itex]\dot{y}[/itex] component in their kinetic energy, so why are there only [itex]\dot{x}[/itex] terms for kinetic energy? Provided link below

http://csirnetphysics.blogspot.com/2012/11/classical-mechanics-question-1.html

In this diagram, x_1 and x_2 correspond to each mass (m_1 and m_2)
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
mikeph
1,235
18
I can't see any correspondence between the diagram and your variables. What are x1 and x2? I don't see any mention of y throughout the derivation.
 

Suggested for: Quick question on coupled pendulum kinetic energy

Replies
16
Views
412
Replies
4
Views
191
Replies
1
Views
150
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
448
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
277
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
958
Replies
34
Views
538
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
435
Top