R twice continuously differentiable function proof

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving an inequality involving a twice continuously differentiable function f defined on the interval [a, b], where f is non-negative and concave down. The participants suggest using the Mean Value Theorem (MVT) to establish the relationship between the function and its secant and tangent lines, which provide the bounds for the integral. The importance of f being twice differentiable is emphasized, as it is crucial for demonstrating the concavity of the function. There is a call for clarification on how to effectively apply these concepts to complete the proof. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for a structured approach to tackle the problem using calculus principles.
irresistible
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
r twice continuously differentiable function proof...

Homework Statement


Help :frown:
if f:[a,b] \rightarrow R is twice continuously differentiable, and f(x)\geq 0 for all x in [a.b]
and f ''(x) \leq 0 for all x in [a,b]
prove that

1/2 (f(a) + f(b)) (b-a) \leq \int f(x)dx \leq(b-a) f(a+b/2)

(integral going from a to b)



Homework Equations



-It's given that f is twice continuously differentiable.




The Attempt at a Solution


By looking at the inequality I'm assuming that I have to use the mean value theorem somewhere..
But how?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Here's a hint. The derivative condition tells you that f(x) is concave down on the interval [a,b]. Draw a graph. Draw the secant line connecting x=a and x=b. That's below the curve, right? Now draw the tangent line at x=(a+b)/2. That's above the curve, right? Your two bounds are related to the integrals of those two linear functions. You'll need the MVT to prove the aboveness and belowness parts, if you don't already have such theorems.
 


the inequality makes sense now that you explained,
I still have trouble proving it,

Where do I use the fact that f is TWICE differentiable?Does that make a difference?
 


You need twice differentiable to show some properties of your curve related to it being concave down. Like those I pointed out yesterday. You haven't done anything on this problem yet. I'd suggest you get started. Don't PM me about problems, ok?
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K