R-UFD, F-fraction field, f monic in F[X], f(a)=0=> a in R

  • Thread starter Thread starter UD1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that if \( f(a) = 0 \) for a monic polynomial \( f \in R[X] \) and \( a \in F \), where \( R \) is a Unique Factorization Domain (UFD) and \( F \) is its field of fractions, then \( a \) must belong to \( R \). The solution involves expressing \( a \) as \( m/n \) with \( m, n \in R \) and coprime, leading to a polynomial equation that can be manipulated to demonstrate that \( a \) is indeed in \( R \). The application of Gauss's lemma is also discussed, emphasizing the importance of clearing denominators to convert the problem into a divisibility issue within \( R \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Unique Factorization Domains (UFD)
  • Knowledge of polynomial rings, specifically \( R[X] \)
  • Familiarity with fields of fractions, particularly \( F \)
  • Concept of coprime elements in integral domains
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Unique Factorization Domains (UFDs)
  • Learn about polynomial factorization in \( R[X] \)
  • Explore Gauss's lemma and its applications in algebra
  • Investigate the concept of coprimality in integral domains
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for algebra students, mathematicians focusing on ring theory, and anyone studying polynomial equations in the context of UFDs and their fields of fractions.

UD1
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let R be a UFD and let F be the field of quotients/fractions for R. If f(a)=0, where f is in R[X] is monic and a is in F, show that a is in R.

The Attempt at a Solution


On one hand if a is F, we can write a=m/n for some m and n in R, where in fact m and n are comprime. Then

f(a)=(m/n)^k+r_{n-1}(m/n)^{k-1}+...+r_1(m/n)+r_0.

Another idea is to use Gauss's lemma. Since f has a root, there exist some g and h from F[X] such that f=gh. But then f=g_0 * h_0 for some polynomials g_0, h_0 from R[X]. Then for one of them, say g_0, we have g_0(a)=0. However that doesn't mean that a is in R.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your first idea seems the right step to take. Since the expression f(a) is zero, you can clear denominators and turn the problem into a divisibility problem in R.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
10K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K