Radiation emission and absorption

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the emission and absorption of radiation by objects, specifically focusing on the application of the Stefan-Boltzmann law and the implications of emissivity in different scenarios. Participants explore theoretical aspects, mathematical formulations, and potential anomalies in energy exchange between bodies at different temperatures.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants state that any object can emit and absorb radiation, with the net power radiated being the difference between emitted and absorbed power, as described by the Stefan-Boltzmann law.
  • There is a question regarding why the surrounding and the object can share the same emissivity, with some suggesting that this is valid if both are blackbodies or greybodies with equal emissivity.
  • Others argue that if the emissivity of the surrounding is less than that of the object, it leads to a situation where the energy radiated from the surrounding is less than the energy absorbed by the object, raising questions about the assumptions in the absorption power equation.
  • Some participants propose that the derivation of the energy loss formula assumes the surrounding radiation is "black," while the object's radiation is "grey," leading to different implications for emissivity in calculations.
  • A later reply questions whether the modified equation allows for heat flow from a lower temperature to a higher temperature, suggesting that under certain conditions, energy could flow from the object to the surrounding despite the temperature difference.
  • Another participant discusses the energy exchange between two bodies facing each other, noting that the warmer body loses energy while the colder body may also lose energy under specific emissivity conditions.
  • Concerns are raised about the accuracy of the formulas when reflected radiation is considered, suggesting that over time, the two bodies may approach a common temperature.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of emissivity and the assumptions underlying the radiation equations. There is no consensus on how to resolve the apparent contradictions in energy exchange between bodies with different emissivities.

Contextual Notes

Limitations in the discussion include assumptions about the nature of radiation (black vs. grey), the role of reflected radiation, and the conditions under which energy exchange occurs. These factors contribute to the complexity of the topic and the lack of resolution in certain areas.

kelvin490
Gold Member
Messages
227
Reaction score
3
Any object can emit and absorb radiation and the power of emission can be represented by the Stefan-Boltzmann law: P=AεσT4

In many texts the net power radiated is the difference between the power emitted and the power absorbed:

Pnet=Aεσ(T4-Ts4) where Ts is the temperature of surrounding.

Why the surrounding and the object can share the same ε ?

If we try to find out the radiation emitted from the surrounding it should be Ps=AεsσTs4, and if εs<ε we will get a strange result that energy radiated from the surrounding is less than the radiation absorbed by the body from the surrounding. How to solve it?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Why the surrounding and the object can share the same ε ?

You would choose to do so if:
1. both are blackbodies where ε = 1,
2. both are a greybody where ε <1, and ε1 = ε2

If ε1 <> ε2 then obviously the emissivity of each is different.
 
256bits said:
You would choose to do so if:
1. both are blackbodies where ε = 1,
2. both are a greybody where ε <1, and ε1 = ε2

If ε1 <> ε2 then obviously the emissivity of each is different.

There still exist a situation that the emissivity of surrounding and the object are different. In the case that emissivity of the surrounding is smaller. Energy radiated from surrounding will be less than energy absorbed by the object if we calculate the absorption power by P=AεσTs4.

The problem is, the above equation assumes that the radiation absorption only depends on the surround temperature and the property of the absorbent. It doesn't include the ability of the surrounding to emit radiation. What am I missing?
 
The derivation of the formula
$$
P = A\epsilon\sigma (T^4 -T_s^4)
$$
for energy loss per unit time most probably assumes that the radiation of the surroundings is "black" (produced by body with emissivity =1). Only the radiation produced inside the body is "grey" (with emissivity ##\epsilon < 1##).

The Kirchhoff law of radiation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirchhoff's_law_of_thermal_radiation

says the absorber absorbs given radiation with efficiency proportional to emissivity ##\epsilon## of the absorber. If the radiation of the surroundings was grey (producing body had emissivity ##\epsilon_s < 1##), it would be the intensity of this radiation which would depend on emissivity ##\epsilon_s##, so its power would be given by ##A\epsilon_s\sigmaT_s^4## and the power of losses would be

$$
P = A\epsilon\sigma (T^4 - \epsilon_sT_s^4)
$$
 
Jano L. said:
The derivation of the formula
$$
P = A\epsilon\sigma (T^4 -T_s^4)
$$
for energy loss per unit time most probably assumes that the radiation of the surroundings is "black" (produced by body with emissivity =1). Only the radiation produced inside the body is "grey" (with emissivity ##\epsilon < 1##).

The Kirchhoff law of radiation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirchhoff's_law_of_thermal_radiation

says the absorber absorbs given radiation with efficiency proportional to emissivity ##\epsilon## of the absorber. If the radiation of the surroundings was grey (producing body had emissivity ##\epsilon_s < 1##), it would be the intensity of this radiation which would depend on emissivity ##\epsilon_s##, so its power would be given by ##A\epsilon_s\sigmaT_s^4## and the power of losses would be

$$
P = A\epsilon\sigma (T^4 - \epsilon_sT_s^4)
$$

Does the equation $$P = A\epsilon\sigma (T^4 - \epsilon_sT_s^4)$$ allows heat flow from lower temperature to higher temperature? It seems it is possible that if $$\epsilon\epsilon_s$$ is very small there exists a situation that even the surrounding temperature is higher than the object's temperature, energy still flows from the object to the surrounding.
 
Let us think of two bodies that face each other with area ##A##. The above formula for ##P## gives energy loss of the colder body. It can be positive (body loses energy) or negative (body gains energy), depending on the value of ##\epsilon_s##.

What happens to the warmer body is a different story. This body radiates energy ##A\epsilon_s\sigma T_s^4## and absorbs energy ##A\epsilon\epsilon_s\sigma T^4## per unit time, so total energy loss of the warmer body is

$$
P_s = A\epsilon_s\sigma(T_s^4 - \epsilon T^4).
$$

Since ##T_s > T## and ##\epsilon \leq 1##, this is positive, no matter the values. In this situation, the warmer body always loses energy.

If ##\epsilon_s## is low enough, also the colder body loses energy. How is that possible?

Total loss of energy

$$
P+P_s
$$

goes into energy of heat radiation in space between the two bodies.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
This is valid description only as long as only the characteristic (from inside the body) radiation of the bodies is prevalent over the reflected radiation. In time, reflected (non-absorbed) radiation of both bodies returns to the body of origin and as soon as this happens, this changes the value of absorbed radiation per unit time so the above formulae are no longer accurate. I've never thought about this in more detail, but I suppose what should happen is that as time goes on, the two bodies approach their temperatures to a common value.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K