Radiation Levels at Earth's Poles

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the radiation levels at Earth's poles, particularly concerning the effects of the magnetosphere and ozone layer on human safety. It highlights that while surface conditions at the poles are generally safe from cosmic radiation, individuals flying over the North Pole experience significantly higher radiation levels due to reduced atmospheric shielding. The conversation also raises concerns about the potential weakening of the magnetosphere, which has decreased by 9% over the last two centuries, and its implications for future safety at the poles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetosphere functions and its protective role against radiation
  • Knowledge of ozone layer dynamics and its impact on UV exposure
  • Familiarity with cosmic radiation and its sources, including solar flares and coronal mass ejections
  • Awareness of altitude effects on radiation exposure, particularly in aviation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of solar flares and coronal mass ejections on Earth's radiation levels
  • Explore the implications of ozone layer depletion on UV radiation exposure
  • Investigate the long-term trends of the magnetosphere's strength and its potential impacts
  • Learn about radiation exposure guidelines for pilots and cabin crew flying at high altitudes
USEFUL FOR

Individuals interested in environmental science, aviation safety professionals, and researchers studying the effects of radiation on human health, particularly in polar regions.

Jaziel
Messages
17
Reaction score
6
TL;DR
How dangerous can the solar & cosmic radiation be at the poles - if at all?
Given that the magnetosphere plays a major role in protecting life here on Earth, how hazardous is the incoming space radiation at the poles? Here I mean at ground level, as opposed to being in an airplane. I'm thinking especially about solar flares, coronal mass ejections, and the like, but also 'normal' space weather. Thanks in advance.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
People live at the South Pole year round.
 
A serious (possibly) problem for living near a ploe is the hole in the ozone layer, thus increasing UV exposure
 
mathman said:
A serious (possibly) problem for living near a ploe is the hole in the ozone layer, thus increasing UV exposure
Most of the time, people are bundled in parkas and insulated clothing, and usually wear protective eyewear because it is so bright. During winter, folks tend to be indoors, especially in the Antarctic.
 
The same applies to the Inuit and Laplanders in the high northern latitudes. It's just that the thought occurred that they might have adapted over time to any increased radiation levels. Evidently this is not the case.

So in view of the fact that surface conditions at the poles are safe enough in terms of cosmic radiation, clearly this protection doesn't apply to those who regularly fly over the north pole, pilots, cabin crew etc - and this at an altitude of just 13km. Is this a measure of how weak the magnetosphere is at the poles? Or has it something to do with reduced air density? (?)

Just one more question: if, as seems likely, the magnetosphere continues to weaken - 9% during the last two centuries alone according to ESA - could there come a time when surface conditions at the poles end up being even more inhospitable, requiring added protection?

https://thepointsguy.co.uk/news/radiation-flights-over-north-pole/
 
Last edited:
Jaziel said:
clearly this protection doesn't apply to those who regularly fly over the north pol
Who is doing this? Presently there are no passsenger flights over the pole. At the peak, there were six per week in each direction.

Radiation in planes is 10x or so the radiation at the surface, just because they are above most of the atmosphere. I'll let Arthur Holly Compton (yes, that Compton) speak to geography: "At sea level the intensity at high latitudes is 14±0.6 percent greater than at the equator; at 2000 m elevation, 22 percent greater; and at 4360 m, 33 percent greater. This variation follows the geomagnetic latitude more closely than the geographic or the local magnetic latitude, and is most rapid between geomagnetic latitudes 25 and 40 degrees"
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Radiation in planes is 10x or so the radiation at the surface, just because they are above most of the atmosphere.
That is interesting. So as well as blocking the worst of UV radiation, the atmosphere really does have a shielding effect when it comes to solar/cosmic radiation, at least here on Earth. Thanks for the explanation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
11K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
398
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K