Radiation to a small object from surroundings

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of the Stefan-Boltzmann equation in the context of energy balance for a small object enclosed in a body, focusing on whether the equation should be treated as a differential equation due to potential changes in temperature over time.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the Stefan-Boltzmann equation should be treated as a differential equation because the small object may absorb or release enough energy to change its temperature, affecting the rate of heat transfer through radiation.
  • Another participant assumes that the equation is intended for energy balance at a single moment in time, not accounting for temperature changes over longer timescales.
  • A third participant expresses uncertainty about the existence of a differential form of the equation, indicating a lack of consensus on this point.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the Stefan-Boltzmann equation should be treated as a differential equation or as applicable only at a single point in time, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential limitations of the equation in capturing dynamic temperature changes and the implications for energy balance over time.

Dong Aleta
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
In the energy balance of a system where a small object at T1 enclosed in a body at T2 given by the Stefan-Boltzmann equation

q = A1ε1σT14 - A1α12σT24

shouldn't it be a differential equation since the small body could be absorbing/releasing sufficient net energy from the enclosing body that will change its temperature, thereby changing its rate of heat transfer through radiation? I guess the same could also be said for the enclosing body.
 
Science news on Phys.org
I assume that the equation is used strictly to find the energy balance at a single time, not to find the energy balance over timescales long enough where the temperature of either object could change.
 
Drakkith said:
I assume that the equation is used strictly to find the energy balance at a single time, not to find the energy balance over timescales long enough where the temperature of either object could change.
I thought so too, but I had to check. I imagined there to be a differential form of this. But anyway, thanks for the response!
 
Dong Aleta said:
I thought so too, but I had to check. I imagined there to be a differential form of this. But anyway, thanks for the response!

There may be. I'm not certain to be honest.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K