Radio Attenuation Rate and Magnetized Iron Mesh

  • Thread starter Thread starter EleSuki
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the attenuation of 5G radio waves when passing through magnetized iron mesh. Participants concluded that magnetization does not significantly affect electromagnetic wave attenuation, as the primary shielding effect is due to the free electrons in the metal. References to studies indicate that while certain magnets can absorb millimeter waves at high frequencies, the lower frequency of 5G waves renders such effects negligible. Overall, the consensus is that magnetized iron mesh will not enhance attenuation performance compared to non-magnetized materials.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic wave properties
  • Familiarity with materials science, specifically magnetic materials
  • Knowledge of radio frequency (RF) technology, particularly 5G
  • Basic principles of wave attenuation and shielding
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of electromagnetic waves and their interaction with materials
  • Study the effects of magnetization on electromagnetic wave propagation
  • Explore the differences in attenuation rates between various materials, including aluminum and iron
  • Investigate the specific absorption characteristics of materials at different frequency bands, particularly millimeter waves
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, physicists, and researchers involved in telecommunications, materials science, and electromagnetic compatibility will benefit from this discussion.

EleSuki
Messages
18
Reaction score
3
The wavelength of 5G radio waves is smaller than that of 4G, and even a gap of 1 mm or so such as aluminum mesh fabric can slip through, so it is said that attenuation performance cannot be demonstrated. However, I wondered what would happen if the article was made of iron mesh magnetized by a magnetizer. Can 5G radio waves slip through even magnetized iron mesh in a prepared manner?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Why do you think magnetization would have any effect on the EM wave?
 
Thanks for the replies, I will try to get back to you on this one. Oh, I was also writing this topic in the hope of gaining scientific knowledge, but if it is inappropriate, please delete this one as well.

I read a post saying that aluminum mesh is not magnetic and iron mesh is magnetic and therefore has a higher attenuation rate of electromagnetic waves, so I was wondering if the properties of the electromagnetic waves themselves would change if the iron mesh fabric was given the properties of a magnet.

https://www.jst.go.jp/pr/announce/20120905-2/index.html
  • (c) Schematic of millimeter wave polarization plane rotation induced by irradiating a magnetized sample with millimeter waves. This ferrite magnet affects the magnetic field component of the electromagnetic wave.
As mentioned in the presentation here, magnets can affect the properties of electromagnetic waves. Therefore, I am interested to know if electromagnetic waves are also attenuated by magnetic forces or magnetic fields.
 
Thanks. I would appreciate it if you could try to translate the page on ChatGPT or DeepL if possible. But I think that would also be a hassle.

I was looking for a similar topic in an English-speaking forum or article discussing what I wanted to know:

https://physics.stackexchange.com/q...radio-waves-from-forcing-two-magnets-together

It has been observed that cooperating magnetic fields, such as neodymium magnets, have no effect on electromagnetic waves. Then, it seems to be safe to assume that imparting the characteristics of a magnet to iron mesh fabric will have no effect on the attenuation rate at all. I have solved the problem myself, but as always, if there is someone who can think with me, I will be able to get to the desired information. Thank you very much for your help.
 
EleSuki said:
I would appreciate it if you could try to translate the page on ChatGPT or DeepL if possible.
We discourage the use of AI chatbots for technical tasks at PF. I'll try to use Google Translate to see what some parts of the paper says.

EleSuki said:
https://physics.stackexchange.com/q...radio-waves-from-forcing-two-magnets-together

It has been observed that cooperating magnetic fields, such as neodymium magnets, have no effect on electromagnetic waves. Then, it seems to be safe to assume that imparting the characteristics of a magnet to iron mesh fabric will have no effect on the attenuation rate at all. I have solved the problem myself, but as always, if there is someone who can think with me, I will be able to get to the desired information. Thank you very much for your help.
I only looked at the first sentence or two of the first answer in that PSE thread, and I agree that there should be no effect on the EM from any magnetization. As it says, it is the free electrons (and skin depth) of the metal shielding that provides the shielding effect for EM.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: EleSuki
Thank you. I am not a scientist and had only skimmed the published paper, but I read it again properly. It seems that the new magnet shown in this paper showed radio absorption in the 220 gigahertz band of millimeter waves. However, the frequency band of 5G radio waves is much lower, so I don't think it is as realistic as I had thought.
I think they must have made a very strong magnet, but in any case, it was good to learn that magnets have no effect on EM.
 
EleSuki said:
new magnet shown in this paper showed radio absorption in the 220 gigahertz band of millimeter waves.
Yikes, that's really high frequency. Maybe the local B-field is doing something with the motion of the free electrons in the metal to provide that effect. I'll try to translate the paper when I get a chance to see what their explanation is for the effect.
 
  • Care
Likes   Reactions: EleSuki

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 85 ·
3
Replies
85
Views
10K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K