Radius of a Raindrop given Charge and Electric Potential

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around calculating the radius of a spherical raindrop given its charge of 5×10-6 C and an electric potential of 8.800×10-8 V at the surface. The formula used is V = (kQ)/r, where k is Coulomb's constant. The initial calculation yielded an implausible radius of 5.11×1011 m, prompting participants to suspect a misprint in the potential value or charge, as both appear unusually high for a raindrop.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Coulomb's Law and electric potential
  • Familiarity with the formula V = (kQ)/r
  • Basic knowledge of unit conversions in physics
  • Experience with problem-solving in electrostatics
NEXT STEPS
  • Verify the values of charge and potential in electrostatic problems
  • Research the significance of Coulomb's constant (k) in calculations
  • Explore common unit conversion errors in physics problems
  • Study examples of electric potential calculations for spherical conductors
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electrostatics, physics educators, and anyone involved in solving electric potential problems in academic settings.

freddy13
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A spherical rain drop carries a charge of 5×10-6 C and has a potential of 8.800×10-8 V at the surface. Find the radius of the drop.


Homework Equations



V = (kQ)/r

The Attempt at a Solution



I simply moved V and r to their respective spots and plugged in my numbers. I got a very large number of 5.11*10^11, so i am wondering if my units are wrong or if I am doing something else wrong. Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, freddy13.

You're right, you're getting a ridiculous answer even though your method is correct. (Your answer for the radius is more than 3 times the distance to the sun.) The value for the potential looks very suspicious. Are you sure that 10 is raised to the negative 8 power? Also, the value for the charge seems very high for a raindrop.
 
Last edited:
Yeah I copied the problem exactly! It has to be something with the units that I am missing, that seems to be the only possibility!
 
I agree. It must be a misprint in the statement of the problem.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K