Radius of ball matters in fall speed

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the observed differences in fall distances of two spherical balls of different sizes when rolled off a ramp. Participants explore the implications of mass, rotational kinetic energy, friction, and the geometry of the ramp setup on the fall speed and distance traveled by the balls.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the larger ball consistently travels farther than the smaller ball, despite expectations based on mass independence in fall speed.
  • One participant suggests that friction might be affecting the smaller ball more significantly than the larger ball.
  • Another participant proposes that the larger ball's greater mass allows it to lose energy to friction more slowly.
  • It is mentioned that rotational kinetic energy could reduce the speed of the ball off the ramp, with calculations provided for solid spheres indicating a difference in final velocity based on moment of inertia.
  • Some participants discuss the possibility of non-uniform density in the larger ball affecting its behavior.
  • One participant raises the idea that the ramp's design might cause the smaller ball to leave at a lower height, resulting in less time in flight and a shorter horizontal distance.
  • Another participant elaborates on how the geometry of the ramp could influence the rotational dynamics of the balls, suggesting that the smaller ball experiences different tangential velocities due to the ramp's constraints.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various hypotheses regarding the effects of friction, rotational dynamics, and ramp geometry, indicating that multiple competing views remain. There is no consensus on the primary reason for the observed differences in fall distances.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations in their understanding of the materials and dimensions of the balls, as well as the specific setup of the ramp, which may influence the results. The discussion includes unresolved questions about the uniformity of the balls' densities and the precise effects of friction.

nhmllr
Messages
183
Reaction score
1
In physics class today, our teacher wanted to demonstrate that mass doesn't have an effect on fall speed. (The class was about gravitational potential energy becoming kinetic, mgh = 1/2 *mv^2 and all that)

Here was the set up: He had a small rail (two parallel thin metal poles) sloping down, becoming completely horizontal at the end, then leading off of a table. He would roll a dense metal spherical ball bearing down the rail, it would roll down the slope, roll off with a horizontal velocity and roll off of the table onto the floor. Where the ball would land, he had a piece of carbon paper over a piece of copy paper, such that the ball would leave an imprint right where it landed.

He rolled a small ball bearing and a larger metal ball (3 or 4 times the radius). But each time he tried, the metal ball would always travel 4 or 5 inches further than the small ball. He tried lining up the middles and being careful in general, but the large ball always traveled farther. The teacher was a little bit disturbed.

Air resistance and friction should be negligible in this example.

So... Why should the large ball go significantly farther?

I thought about this for a bit. I thought that maybe some of the energy in the larger ball was going into rotational kinetic energy. But as the velocity of the center of mass is equal to the tangential velocity of rotation, the kinetic energy lost to rotational kinetic energy should be proportional for both the large and small balls. In other words, I don't see how the radius would affect the velocity.

So what gives!?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Clearly it must be friction somewhere in the system, because the velocity at the bottom is independent of mass as are the equations describing horizontal and vertical positions with respect to time.
 
I'd guess that the larger ball has more mass and takes longer to lose its energy to friction.
 
schaefera said:
Clearly it must be friction somewhere in the system, because the velocity at the bottom is independent of mass as are the equations describing horizontal and vertical positions with respect to time.

Okay then. Why should friction affect the small ball so much substantially more?
 
Rotational KE actually does reduce speed off the ramp.PE -> KE

##\small mgh = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 + \frac{1}{2}I\omega^2##

Now, for a solid sphere of uniform density, ##\small I = \frac{2}{5}mR^2##. And for any rolling object ##\small v = \omega R##.

##\small mgh = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 + \frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{2}{5}mR^2\right)\left(\frac{v}{R}\right)^2 = (\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{5})mv^2##

In other words, instead of ##\small v=\sqrt{2gh}## for point mass, for a solid sphere you get ##\small v=\sqrt{\frac{10}{7}gh}##, which is significantly smaller.

So now that we've established that rotation does matter, it should be clear that varying moment of inertia will result in different speed off the ramp. A cylinder, for example, will roll off the ramp traveling slower than a sphere.

If the larger sphere had a heavier core and a lighter shell, it would readily explain the situation. If both spheres were perfectly uniform, then friction is all you have left. How large was the ball bearing?

Okay then. Why should friction affect the small ball so much substantially more?
Weight of the object increases as cube of the radius. Drag as square. So at any given velocity, weight/drag is higher for larger sphere, assuming the densities are equal. That means larger sphere will have higher terminal velocity.

Of course, with distances involved, the small bearing would have to be pretty tiny to make a difference that significant. That's why I ask you how big it actually is.
 
K^2 said:
If the larger sphere had a heavier core and a lighter shell, it would readily explain the situation. If both spheres were perfectly uniform, then friction is all you have left. How large was the ball bearing?

Ah, very interesting question. It didn't cross my mind that the large ball bearing might not have uniform density. While if both balls were of uniform density in a frictionless environment, they really should land in the same place.

I don't have very accurate measurements of this ball. I was only observing the teacher handle the ball in the front of the class 16 hours ago. But from my memory I'd say it was about... 1.5 to 2 inches in diameter. Would a ball of that size typically be made out of different material?
 
nhmllr said:
Here was the set up: He had a small rail (two parallel thin metal poles) sloping down, becoming completely horizontal at the end, then leading off of a table.

With this style of ramp, the smaller ball leaves the table at a slightly lower height from the floor - both the center of mass and the bottom surface of the ball that's going to touch the carbon paper are lower. Therefore it spends less time in flight and covers a shorter horizontal distance before it touches the ground.
 
Nugatory said:
With this style of ramp, the smaller ball leaves the table at a slightly lower height from the floor - both the center of mass and the bottom surface of the ball that's going to touch the carbon paper are lower. Therefore it spends less time in flight and covers a shorter horizontal distance before it touches the ground.

Hmm... that seems negligible though.

However, the space between the poles might have an effect on the balls.

The large ball is essentially on a flat surface, while small ball has the two poles touching very close to the ball's axis.

Now, the rotational kinetic energy of ball is dependent on the tangential velocity of the outermost rotating particles.

When the ball is rolling on the ground, this tangential velocity is equal to the velocity at the center of mass.

However, in this rail case, what might be happening is that the tangential velocity is equal to the much more than the center of mass velocity, because the tangential velocity that is equal to the center of mass velocity is the velocity of the particles closer to the center.

In this way, the rotational energy will sap more energy from the kinetic energy when the ball is smaller on this ramp.

I will talk to the teacher tomorrow and perhaps we will conduct the experiment with a flat board instead of the rails and see what happens.
 
nhmllr said:
The large ball is essentially on a flat surface, while small ball has the two poles touching very close to the ball's axis.
Ha, ha, ha. I didn't even think about that. That explains it completely. This changes relationship in equations above from ##\small v = \omega R## to ##\small v = \omega R'## for some ##\small R' < R##. If you track it through to the final velocity formula, this gives you a decrease in final velocity. The larger the disparity between ##\small R## and ##\small R'## the stronger the effect. And this is definitely going to be a strong enough effect to explain the difference.

I can't believe I didn't think of this right away. I was even picturing it correctly in my head with the two wires, and the ball rolling close to axis... Guh.

Mystery solved, people. Move along.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K