Radius of Inscribed Circle in a Quadrant of a Circle

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The radius of the inscribed circle in a quadrant of a circle with a radius of 5 is calculated using the formula r = 5 / (1 + √2). The discussion highlights the geometric approach involving a 45-45-90 triangle formed by bisecting the 90° angle at the origin. Participants clarified the relationship between the segments and the inscribed circle's radius, correcting initial assumptions about the midpoint of the radius. The final consensus confirms that the radius of the inscribed circle is derived from the relationship between the larger circle's radius and the geometry of the triangle.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of 45-45-90 triangles
  • Familiarity with inscribed circles and their properties
  • Basic knowledge of geometric relationships in circles
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions involving square roots
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the inscribed circle radius in various geometric configurations
  • Learn about the properties of 45-45-90 triangles and their applications
  • Explore rationalizing denominators in algebraic expressions
  • Investigate the relationship between inscribed and circumscribed circles in different shapes
USEFUL FOR

Students studying geometry, mathematics educators, and anyone interested in solving problems related to inscribed circles and geometric properties of circles.

Wildcat
Messages
114
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the radius of a circle inscribed in a quadrant of a circle with radius 5

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I worked this but I'm not sure if its correct. I looked at the first quadrant so a quarter of a circle with radius 5. I drew the radius that would bisect the angle at the origin into 45° angles. I found the midpoint of the radius and dropped a line to the x-axis from that midpoint. This forms a 45-45-90 triangle which would make the radius of the inscribed circle 2.5/√2. Is this correct??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your method seems correct, but I got \frac{5}{1+\sqrt{2}}.

Is it possible you can show a picture of where you are making your triangle?
 
Villyer said:
Your method seems correct, but I got \frac{5}{1+\sqrt{2}}.

Is it possible you can show a picture of where you are making your triangle?

I am looking at the first quadrant. Center of the circle with radius 5 is at the origin, so I draw my radius from the origin and bisecting the 90° angle. Then from the midpoint of that radius (2.5)(which I think will be the center of the inscribed circle) I drop the segment to the x-axis which will be a leg of the 45-45-90 and also the radius of the inscribed circle.?? so the triangle has a hypotenuse of 2.5 and dividing by √2 would be the leg/radius ??
 
Is the center circle here the one you are trying to find the radius of?

2iM6G.png
 
Villyer said:
Is the center circle here the one you are trying to find the radius of?

1wZYA.png

Yes! I love the drawing!
 
The problem with your work I think was assuming that the line dropped down from the center of that circle bisected the bottom line, which isn't true.
 
Villyer said:
The problem with your work I think was assuming that the line dropped down from the center of that circle bisected the bottom line, which isn't true.

No I wasn't assuming that. The first part of the bottom line would be 2.5/√2 as well since the triangle formed is a 45-45-90.
 
Oh oh oh, I see now. But if that were true, then wouldn't the radius also have to be 2.5? Since the segment from the center to the outside of the larger circle is 2.5 and that is another radius of the circle.
 
Villyer said:
Oh oh oh, I see now. But if that were true, then wouldn't the radius also have to be 2.5? Since the segment from the center to the outside of the larger circle is 2.5 and that is another radius of the circle.

I don't think the midpoint of the 5 radius is the center of the inscribed circle anymore because you are correct about the 2.5 but the perpendicular line would also have to be a radius and it is 2.5√2 so that must not be the center
 
  • #10
If it helps, I used the diagonal line in order to solve for the radius.

I don't want to say too much however.
 
  • #11
Villyer said:
If it helps, I used the diagonal line in order to solve for the radius.

I don't want to say too much however.

Are you talking about the radius drawn in that bisects the 90° at the origin??
 
  • #12
Yeah, the one that is 45 degrees above the horizontal.
 
  • #13
I'm assuming you didn't use 2.5,2.5 as your center??
 
  • #14
Right.

What is the length of that segment? How can you label its parts in terms of r?
 
  • #15
I'm not sure I need to look at it some more :(
 
  • #16
Ok now I got (10-√2)/4 its close to your answer but still not the same. I need to go back and see if I made a calculation error.
 
  • #17
Explain how you got to that.
 
  • #18
Its wrong I was assuming that perpendicular segment was the radius of the inscribed circle. I need to add 2.5 to that piece that I keep thinking is a radius (but not) to get the diameter but I don't know how to get it
 
  • #19
The perpindicular segment is a radius though.

And you never use the number 2.5 here.
 
  • #20
Ok so 2 of those segments make the diameter of the inscribed circle. and that little piece outside the circle would need to be subtracted from 5. Should I be able to find that segment length first??
 
  • #21
No, that little segment doesn't have to be solved for. It's easier to solve for the segment from the center of the small center to the center of the large circle.
 
  • #22
So the length from the center of the small circle to the center of the large circle is r√2?
 
  • #23
which means r√2 +r=5 then r=5/(√2 +1) Right!
 
  • #24
Yep, that's what I got!

If you rationalize the denominator the answer gets a little bit simpler, I'm not sure if this is for a class where you have to do that.
 
  • #25
Thank you so Much!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
75K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K