Radius of largest possible loop of an Airplane.

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the radius of the largest possible loop for a 2250 kg airplane traveling at 320 km/h. Participants express uncertainty about the assumptions needed for the problem, particularly regarding thrust, drag, and the experience of g-forces at the loop's apex. The concept of "critical speed" is debated, with suggestions that the airplane behaves like a projectile at the top of the loop, lacking lift. There is consensus that assuming constant speed without positive g-forces leads to a smaller radius, complicating the solution. Overall, the problem is considered challenging due to its ambiguous parameters.
HRubss
Messages
66
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A 2250 kg airplane makes a loop the loop (vertical circle) at a speed of 320 km/hour. Find (a) the radius of the largest circular loop possible and (b) The force on the plane at the bottom of this loop.

Homework Equations


F = m*a
Centripetal Force = m * (v2)/r
"Critical Speed" = Sqrt ( r*g) (I'm not sure if that's the proper term)
1/2 *m*v2 = 1/2*m*v2

The Attempt at a Solution


Since no height was given in the problem, I set the altitude of the plane at 0 so it shouldn't have any potential energy at the bottom of the loop. Using the conservation of energy and 0 potential energy, I have the 3rd equation. I also know that the "critical speed" is equal to the square root of the radius * gravitation force so I substitute that into my final kinetic energy's velocity and solve for the radius. I'm not sure if this is correct and I know that the normal force is dependent on the finding the correct radius, I don't attempt part b just yet.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem statement is a bit weird because (a) airplanes have thrust and (b) airplanes have wings. It is unclear what you are supposed to assume. No thrust and no drag (=conservation of energy is useful)? Constant speed? "Feet down" feeling at the top (=the critical speed applies)? Or nearly zero speed at the top?
Assuming no thrust, no drag, and "feet down" feeling: At which height does the airplane need this critical speed (or, asked differently: where is this the limiting factor)? You can plug that into an equation for the conservation of energy and solve for r.
 
I agree question is a bit problematical.

I would assume that the pilot maintains a constant speed.
I probably wouldn't assume the pilot experiences positive g ("feet down" feeling) at the top because I think that implies a loop of bigger radius is possible.
 
My guess is you are supposed to pretend that the airplane is not capable of flying upside down for an extended period, i.e. that it can generate no lift when inverted. So at the top of the loop it is behaving like a wingless rocket, or even a projectile.
 
CWatters said:
I agree question is a bit problematical.

I would assume that the pilot maintains a constant speed.
I probably wouldn't assume the pilot experiences positive g ("feet down" feeling) at the top because I think that implies a loop of bigger radius is possible.
This combination of assumptions doesn't lead to a maximal radius.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K