Raising a farm windmill tower

  • Thread starter Thread starter kapkichi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tower Windmill
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges of raising a 35-foot windmill tower with an attached mill head using a crane. Concerns include the stresses introduced during the lift, particularly the moment created by the mill in a horizontal position and the axial/bending stress on the tower's lower legs. Suggestions include picking the tower from a point 3.5 feet down to limit the moment arm and considering the worst-case scenarios during the lift. Some participants recommend using a gin pole for easier attachment of the mill head and suggest alternative lifting methods to reduce structural stress. Overall, the focus is on ensuring safe and effective lifting techniques while addressing the mechanical stresses involved.
kapkichi
Messages
2
Reaction score
2
TL;DR Summary
want to understand the mechanics/critical points of picking up a windmill tower with a crane.
I have a retirement project in restoring an old farm windmill and am close to being ready for the install. I want to pick the 35' tower and mill head together in one operation using a crane. My last statics class was 45 years ago so I'm a little rusty. I know the mill weight of 250 lbs will add stresses during the lift that the tower wasn't designed for. The tower is about 700 lbs. I believe my concerns are the moment introduced by the mill in the horizontal position and the combined axial/bending stress on the 2 lower tower legs while it is being tipped up to vertical. My thought was to pick the tower 3.5' down from the top which is the bearing for the mill post. I can't lift from the mill head because it only sits in the tower by gravity.
My questions
Does my pick point limit the moment arm to 3.5 feet or should I be looking at the point where the first girt and tension diagonals are, 5' down from the top.
Is the horizontal position the worst case scenario for moment or somewhere else along the 90 degree rotation to vertical.
I'm thinking by using a crane (vs. jib beam and winch technique) with the pick point always vertical that should lessen the axial forces in the lower tower legs. Is 45 degrees the worst case for this. What would a FBD look like to analyze that? The original design doesn't have horizontal girts around the bottom. I have added those on all 4 faces to help distribute the lower tower leg load to all 4 legs. Once the tower is hanging vertical I will attach leg anchors and socket into bored holes. one of the windmill forums offered some ancedotal advice suggesting the lower legs be lifted while the crane is picking to vertical (could due that with tractor on the lower girt) but I fail to see the value in doing that. I have attached a sketch to help visualize
Any advice, sketches of a FBD on how to further analyze would be welcome
IMG_4155.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Forgive the potentially dumb question, but… why do you have to tip the tower up with the mill head attached? If you have sufficient lift capacity and height to tip the tower upright with the head on it, it would seem that you could tip the tower itself, then hoist the mechanical kit as a second, separate lift. Sure, you have to send someone up to the top for final attachment, but it would reduce the stresses on the structure.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and Tom.G
Flyboy said:
Sure, you have to send someone up to the top for final attachment,
'Working at Heights' regulations and training would come into the problem. Really best avoided if you don't have a qualified rigger on hand.
kapkichi said:
TL;DR Summary: want to understand the mechanics/critical points of picking up a windmill tower with a crane.

My thought was to pick the tower 3.5' down from the top
I have only experience of lifting and lowering a 10m mast (90kg) and have done it single handed. I used an A frame (calculated leg lengths and starting angle for optimum forces) , pivoted about a line through the base so it's simpler than your problem. But I would probably think in terms of more than one lifting line, giving the turbine a separate line to reduce torque on the tower.
But would the static weight of the turbine be greater than the maximum expected force from the wind? If not then I can't see there would be any problem with a single pick point just above the centre of mass of the ensemble.
kapkichi said:
TL;DR Summary: want to understand the mechanics/critical points of picking up a windmill tower with a crane.

I can't lift from the mill head because it only sits in the tower by gravity.
That could be a worry. It suggests that the turbine was lifted onto an already erect tower. Do you know how they did the job? Some pins would avoid problems of the turbine rocking out of the top of the tower.
 
Last edited:
I have moved a few wind pumps alone, and have not needed a crane. A crane might make it easier, but it is an unnecessary cost. If you lift the tower with a crane, you might need a couple of temporary diagonals to handle compression from the bottom feet to the first girts. You will also have to check the lubrication and oiler rings are in place.

The best first investment is in a gin pole for the top of the tower. That makes fitting and removing the head, vanes or tail an easy operation. Attach a vertical tube at the top that a gin pole can seat in. The gin pole should be an inverted 'J' with a pulley block. The gin pole rotates in the tube from over the wind-shaft to outside the tower. Remove the gin pole when the wind pump is in operation.

To raise the tower, chain the lower two feet to the near footings. Mount a 20ft 'A' frame, (shear legs), with feet at the foot of the tower, also attached with the chains.
A rope or wire passes from the top of the tower to the top of the 'A' frame, to the tractor draw bar. Use the tractor to raise the tower. The high point of the 'A' reduces stress on the bottom of the tower during the lift.

If you did not raise the tower with the head fitted, lift the head and vanes with the gin pole.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban, Nik_2213 and sophiecentaur
IIRC, the safest approach with truss-base hinged at back is to have a sufficiently tall A-frame --As mentioned above !!-- to convert that initial low-angled, inefficient pull to something with much better 'mechanical advantage'...

IIRC, from my 'yachty' reading, the A-frame may either re-direct the main haul-line, so stand between winch and task, typically over hinge-line, or be a stand-alone hoist to get the 'spar' to advantageous angle for the main winch to accept. This may straddle mast near its c/g, be it bare or top-loaded. Sundry control guys essential, of course, of course...

FWIW, you probably need a 'tail' guy-line to control later stages of main lift, as tower c/g approaches footprint of base and 'Dire Lord Murphy' unleashes 'butterfly effect'. Best make that two, set diagonally...

Converse of task is 'Spanish Windlass' & Co, where even a child applying 'minimal' side-ways force to a taut tow-line may significantly contribute to un-ditching car: Been there, done that...
 
Flyboy said:
Forgive the potentially dumb question, but… why do you have to tip the tower up with the mill head attached? If you have sufficient lift capacity and height to tip the tower upright with the head on it, it would seem that you could tip the tower itself, then hoist the mechanical kit as a second, separate lift. Sure, you have to send someone up to the top for final attachment, but it would reduce the stresses on the structure.
agree that's the prefeered way structurally. 2 issue- to plumb and level the tower exactly over the well head I want the the mill and well rods attached. the tower isn't perfectly straight. The way the mill post seats into bearing cup I would need to mobilize a bucket truck while the mill is suspended to facilitate that connection. much easier to insert and do own ground
 
  • Like
Likes Nik_2213 and Flyboy
Thread 'What type of toilet do I have?'
I was enrolled in an online plumbing course at Stratford University. My plumbing textbook lists four types of residential toilets: 1# upflush toilets 2# pressure assisted toilets 3# gravity-fed, rim jet toilets and 4# gravity-fed, siphon-jet toilets. I know my toilet is not an upflush toilet because my toilet is not below the sewage line, and my toilet does not have a grinder and a pump next to it to propel waste upwards. I am about 99% sure that my toilet is not a pressure assisted...
After over 25 years of engineering, designing and analyzing bolted joints, I just learned this little fact. According to ASME B1.2, Gages and Gaging for Unified Inch Screw Threads: "The no-go gage should not pass over more than three complete turns when inserted into the internal thread of the product. " 3 turns seems like way to much. I have some really critical nuts that are of standard geometry (5/8"-11 UNC 3B) and have about 4.5 threads when you account for the chamfers on either...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
Back
Top