What Factors Limit the Maximum Information Density on a Magnetic Disk?

  • Thread starter Thread starter flatmaster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hardware Random
Click For Summary
The maximum information density on a magnetic disk is primarily limited by the size of the read/write head and the mechanical challenges of maintaining the head's distance from the disk surface to prevent crashes. Advances in technology have allowed heads to operate as close as 3 nm to the disk, enhancing data density. In terms of data transfer, modern ports like USB have reverted to serial communication, which allows for higher data rates despite the initial advantages of parallel ports. The current voltage conventions for bit representation typically range from 0 to 0.8 V for a 0 and 2 to 5 V for a 1, designed to minimize noise interference. Theoretical limits for information density in a wire could change with the assumption of ideal conductors, but practical constraints remain significant.
flatmaster
Messages
497
Reaction score
2
I was thinking about a colloquim speaker I heard once and I have a few unanswered questions. He was talking about the manufacturing process for the read/write head for a hard drive. Obviously, the goal was to make the part smaller and smaller to increase the possible information density on the disk. My question is...

What is the limiting factor for maximum information density on a magnetic disk? Size of the read/write head, mechanical limitations for moving the arm, or the size of the actual magnetic dipole that encodes the bit on the disk ? Or perhaps something I'm not even thinking of.

Secondly, I wonder about ports. At first, there were serial ports. Then came along parallel ports, allowing faster information exchange. However, the newest ports (USB/Firewire) have returned to serial communication. Was there a singular burst in the information that could be carried by a single wire that allowed this to occur?

Thirdly, I recall from my electronics class that there were several conventions that existed for classifying a bit. For example, 5V was a 1, while 0V was a 0. What is the current convention. I assume it is a minimum voltage to minimize power use, but large enough to consistently carry the bit.

Finally, what would be the theoretical and practical limit of information density in a single wire. Would assuming an ideal conductor change this limit?

I hope my random musings at least make sense. Thanks.
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
1. The minimal area the read/write head can polarize is equal to the width of the magnetic dipole. However, to write to the disc with a smaller gap size requires the head to be closer to the disk's surface. The difficulty is in making sure the head doesn't "crash" on the disc, i.e. stays above the surface. From a glance at Wikipedia, it looks like modern hard drives can let heads fly as close as 3 nm above the disc's surface.

2. Don't know.

3. I think the most common assignment is 0 to 0.8 V for 0, and 2 to 5 V for 1. The reason for the gap is to isolate the ranges so that there's no risk of one signal being interpreted for the other because of noise.
 
Thread 'ChatGPT Examples, Good and Bad'
I've been experimenting with ChatGPT. Some results are good, some very very bad. I think examples can help expose the properties of this AI. Maybe you can post some of your favorite examples and tell us what they reveal about the properties of this AI. (I had problems with copy/paste of text and formatting, so I'm posting my examples as screen shots. That is a promising start. :smile: But then I provided values V=1, R1=1, R2=2, R3=3 and asked for the value of I. At first, it said...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
883
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K