Random Photos

  • Thread starter Thread starter morrobay
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photos Random
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a variety of photography topics, showcasing personal photos and experiences from different locations, including Ko-Larn Island, Central Park, and various natural landscapes. Participants share insights about the techniques used in their photography, such as drone shots and long exposure panoramas, and discuss the beauty of nature, including autumn scenes and night skies. There are mentions of personal stories, including a trip to Sweden and memories of family history, particularly relating to military service during WWII. The conversation also touches on the impact of the pandemic on tourism and local businesses, as well as the enjoyment of photography as a creative outlet. Additionally, there are discussions about photography gear, including vintage lenses and new cameras, and the excitement of capturing unique moments like rainbows and wildlife. Overall, the thread highlights the joy of photography and the shared experiences of capturing the world around them.
  • #1,291
We took the coast route to seafood market
IMG_20230712_152114.jpg
IMG_20230712_153046_1.jpg
IMG_20230712_152815.jpg
IMG_20230712_154456_1.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970 and DennisN
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #1,292
Borg said:
My wife and I are doing an Alaskan cruise out of Seattle soon.
I hope you bring a camera/smartphone!
Alaska can be darn beautiful, from what I understand.
And we want photos posted here later... :smile:
 
  • #1,293
Happy July!

Here's a gorgeous flower I've seen a couple of times, and this time I shot it.
I just love that the different petals are in different, distinct colors.
Google Pictures says it's some sort of Dahlia.

DSC05552.png

(shot with Canon nFD 50mm f/1.4, at least I think so :smile:)
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, morrobay, BillTre and 4 others
  • #1,294
A little bit of green in Hyde.

IMG_20230607_205825_593.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes DennisN, Rive, BillTre and 2 others
  • #1,295
I took about eight pictures and none of them really captured what I wanted. This was the closest.
Screenshot_2023-03-07-17-27-16-04_6012fa4d4ddec268fc5c7112cbb265e7~4.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes DennisN, Rive, BillTre and 2 others
  • #1,296
Not a great picture, not centred correctly, probably because I climbed up the statute opposite to get a better scope. I'm not great with heights.
I spent many an hour here in the 80s, central library, Manchester.
IMG_20230708_115555_761.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • #1,297
pinball1970 said:
central library
Where?
 
  • #1,298
phinds said:
Where?
Manchester.
 
  • #1,299
Here's a restaurant where the food is really hot:

IMG_0289.jpeg
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes phinds, berkeman, jack action and 6 others
  • #1,300
DennisN said:
I just love that the different petals are in different, distinct colors.
Google Pictures says it's some sort of Dahlia.
That Dahlia photo got my wife's attention (she is into colored-pencil artwork and wants to try sketching it).

After a bit of on-line research she came up with:
Sorry, no URL; she is on a tablet and can't display such 'unimportant' things! It was found thru a Google search for Dahlia Mary Eveline. The following came up when she clicked on one of the first few sponsored advertising images.

Call name: Dahlia Anemone Mary Eveline (some American sites use Evelyn)
(Scientific)
Name: Dahlia
Species: Dahlia
Genus: Dahlia
Family: Asteraceae
Order: Asterales
Hardiness: Zones 8-11
Duration: Perennial
Sun exposure: Full Shade
Soil: Loam, Sand, Clay
Soil PH: 6.1-7.5
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes pinball1970 and DennisN
  • #1,301
Tom.G said:
That Dahlia photo got my wife's attention (she is into colored-pencil artwork and wants to try sketching it).

After a bit of on-line research she came up with:
Sorry, no URL; she is on a tablet and can't display such 'unimportant' things! It was found thru a Google search for Dahlia Mary Eveline. The following came up when she clicked on one of the first few sponsored advertising images.

Call name: Dahlia Anemone Mary Eveline (some American sites use Evelyn)
(Scientific)
Name: Dahlia
Species: Dahlia
Genus: Dahlia
Family: Asteraceae
Order: Asterales
Hardiness: Zones 8-11
Duration: Perennial
Sun exposure: Full Shade
Soil: Loam, Sand, Clay
Soil PH: 6.1-7.5
Thanks a lot! :smile:
 
  • #1,302
I got some help stringing together a series of images into a video, the idea is a continuous zoom. Hope you enjoy it!

 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes DennisN, morrobay, collinsmark and 3 others
  • #1,303
Andy Resnick said:
I got some help stringing together a series of images into a video, the idea is a continuous zoom. Hope you enjoy it!
Fun Easter Egg! What are the black rectangles around the IC? They look too fine-pitch to be wire bonding pads...?

1689621244985.png
 
Last edited:
  • #1,304
berkeman said:
Fun Easter Egg! What are the black rectangles around the IC? They look too fine-pitch to be wire bonding pads...?

View attachment 329375
If I understand what you mean, those are indeed the bonding pads... I don't think there were actual wires, tho-not sure what the correct terminology is for modern stuff (bump bonding?)
 
  • #1,305
Andy Resnick said:
If I understand what you mean, those are indeed the bonding pads... I don't think there were actual wires, tho-not sure what the correct terminology is for modern stuff (bump bonding?)
Pretty amazing stuff. One of the previous companies I worked for did advanced IC packaging, but I was only peripherally involved in that part of the business. Looking it up now, I guess it is indeed possible...

https://semiengineering.com/scaling-bump-pitches-in-advanced-packaging/

1689700325666.png


Interconnects for advanced packaging are at a crossroads as an assortment of new package types are pushing further into the mainstream, with some vendors opting to extend the traditional bump approaches while others roll out new ones to replace them.

The goal in all cases is to ensure signal integrity between components in IC packages as the volume of data being processed increases. But as devices continue to shrink and more components are added into advanced packages to process, move, and store more data, new technologies with more I/Os will be required. So while traditional solder balls and/or copper microbumps still will be used for the foreseeable future, new technologies are under development that can augment or replace those interconnect technologies, increasing the number of I/Os and providing more headroom for scaling.

As always, size and cost are the determining factors. Copper microbumps are smaller than solder balls/bumps, enabling more I/Os in packages. In today’s advanced packages, the most advanced microbumps involve a 40μm pitch, which equates to 20μm to 25μm bump sizes with 15μm spacing between the adjacent bumps on the die.
 
  • #1,306
Doing some formation practice in DCS with some friends.

Screen_230510_002652.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, morrobay, Ivan Seeking and 2 others
  • #1,307
Flyboy said:
Doing some formation practice in DCS with some friends.
Hmm... I recognize those signs. Swedish aircraft? Three crowns?
 
  • #1,308
DennisN said:
Hmm... I recognize those signs. Swedish aircraft? Three crowns?
Correct! It's an AJS37 Viggen.
 
  • #1,309
Same photo with one inverted

1689803431258.jpeg


1689803465860.png
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970 and phinds
  • #1,310
The light intensities give it away.
Double reflected light will be less bright that singly reflected light.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, Ivan Seeking and morrobay
  • #1,311
Andy Resnick said:
I got some help stringing together a series of images into a video, the idea is a continuous zoom. Hope you enjoy it!
That is so darn cool with the zoom ins!
I feel you are just one step away from getting an electron microscope :biggrin:.
Probably hard to find in cheap, small versions, though... :smile:

Here's one listed, though I somehow don't think it's the real thing :biggrin::

USBScope.jpg


Aah, imagine if electron microscopes were available in these sizes and at this price...
...what a wonderful world it would be :smile:.
 
  • Like
Likes Andy Resnick
  • #1,312
DennisN said:
Aah, imagine if electron microscopes were available in these sizes and at this price...
...what a wonderful world it would be :smile:.
Except, you have to sit in a vacuum chamber to look through it... :wink:
 
  • #1,313
berkeman said:
Except, you have to sit in a vacuum chamber
That sucks.
 
  • Haha
Likes pinball1970, berkeman and DennisN
  • #1,314
berkeman said:
Except, you have to sit in a vacuum chamber to look through it...

Ibix said:
That sucks.

What's all this fuss about vacuum? It's nothing, really.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, phinds, Ivan Seeking and 4 others
  • #1,315
DennisN said:
What's all this fuss about vacuum? It's nothing, really.

You can't breathe. 😜
 
  • #1,316
DennisN said:
That is so darn cool with the zoom ins!
I feel you are just one step away from getting an electron microscope :biggrin:.
Probably hard to find in cheap, small versions, though... :smile:

Here's one listed, though I somehow don't think it's the real thing :biggrin::


Aah, imagine if electron microscopes were available in these sizes and at this price...
...what a wonderful world it would be :smile:.
The low price is matched by the low magnification! (from site: Magnification ratio: 50X-1000X)

It's practically an electron mAcroscope!
 
  • #1,317
Ibix said:
That sucks.
My shopvac also blows :)
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre and Ibix
  • #1,318
That's an optical microscope mislabeled as an electron microscope by some stupid marketer, probably it is electronic and he got confused.

Even the smallest EMs (electron microscopes) take a table top. And yes, they do require a vacuum (those electrons have to be able to fly free).
They also require high voltages (not usually available at home) and a very vibration free install site.
Scanning EMs look at surfaces and are probably the smallest.
Transmission EMs (electrons going through sections) are larger and often higher power.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes DennisN, collinsmark and berkeman
  • #1,319
BillTre said:
The light intensities give it away.
Double reflected light will be less bright that singly reflected light.
You can also see a couple of branches floating in the air.
 
  • #1,320
My favorite photo, when I was studying their work they always seemed bigger than life. But when I look at this, I try to see them as average people and not as the rock stars of physics. I know a bit about some of their personal lives but not much. I have to think their egos were huge! I tend to think an evening with that crowd would not be easy.

1689887115732.png
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K