Random Photos

  • Thread starter Thread starter morrobay
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photos Random
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a variety of photography topics, showcasing personal photos and experiences from different locations, including Ko-Larn Island, Central Park, and various natural landscapes. Participants share insights about the techniques used in their photography, such as drone shots and long exposure panoramas, and discuss the beauty of nature, including autumn scenes and night skies. There are mentions of personal stories, including a trip to Sweden and memories of family history, particularly relating to military service during WWII. The conversation also touches on the impact of the pandemic on tourism and local businesses, as well as the enjoyment of photography as a creative outlet. Additionally, there are discussions about photography gear, including vintage lenses and new cameras, and the excitement of capturing unique moments like rainbows and wildlife. Overall, the thread highlights the joy of photography and the shared experiences of capturing the world around them.
  • #3,001
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3,002
BillTre said:
New architectural style:

View attachment 363656
Better not try putting a grand piano in that room at far left. :wink:
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes pinball1970, BillTre and DennisN
  • #3,003
BillTre said:
New architectural style:

View attachment 363656
Restaurant in the Indian district, Pattaya
IMG_20250725_080736.webp
IMG_20250725_085954.webp
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes collinsmark, DennisN, BillTre and 1 other person
  • #3,005
10313.webp

Can't go wrong with some github merch! (I didn't buy all of it nor did I keep all of it - it wasn't all for myself, don't worry)


(This was a while ago)
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, collinsmark and DennisN
  • #3,006
How long does it take you to see it?

illusion.webp

You should see 4 stainless steel forks laying side by side on a pink towel. The forks are cropped at the top and bottom.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Astranut, pinball1970, collinsmark and 2 others
  • #3,007
? forever, apparently
 
  • #3,008
phinds said:
? forever, apparently
Do you see 5 pink drips on an indistinct background or 4 forks on a pink towel?
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes BillTre, TensorCalculus, Borg and 1 other person
  • #3,009
renormalize said:
Do you see 5 pink drips on an indistinct background or 4 forks on a pink towel?
I can see either one, but so what? This is supposed to break my brain? I don't think so.

Here's one that DID almost break my brain:

optical illusion sprial.webp
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970 and DennisN
  • #3,010
phinds said:
I can see either one, but so what? This is supposed to break my brain? I don't think so.

Here's one that DID almost break my brain:

View attachment 363734
But that's not a photo. I protest!

You will realize your brain was broken when you will see what the subject of the photo really is.
 
  • #3,011
Today I did a day-trip to Charlotte NC for a stamp show. Before entering the venue at Central Piedmont Community College, I took this picture from the sidewalk outside.

IMG_6620.webp


What you can't see in the picture is that Charlotte recorded a record high temperature for today's date: 101F. :eek:

I actually took this picture a few hours before "peak heat", so it might have been only 98F or so at the moment. At least I had to walk only a couple hundred feet from the parking garage.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes collinsmark, pinball1970, morrobay and 2 others
  • #3,012
jtbell said:
I took this picture from the sidewalk outside
Lovely perspective!
 
  • #3,013
Summer shower, I took cover in Hyde bus station.

IMG_20250721_175421_898~2.webp

I raised brightness, saturation and sharpness. Way too dark otherwise. Same image below before I touched it up.

IMG_20250721_175421_898.webp


IMG_20250721_175507_110~2.webp


IMG_20250721_175315_456~2.webp
 
  • Like
Likes Astranut, collinsmark, DennisN and 1 other person
  • #3,015
jack action said:
I just love how it says "Look Right" while the bus is coming from the left ...
Yeah they go left round the station. I made a dash for the pub but still got soaked.
 
  • #3,016
jack action said:
I just love how it says "Look Right" while the bus is coming from the left ...
The bus is turning towards the left of the picture, which will take it in a loop round the station. The "Look Right" bit is one-way from the right.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes jack action and pinball1970
  • #3,017
Hike in rain: end of drought.
aIMG_20250727_153451.webp


aIMG_20250727_142500.webp
 

Attachments

  • aIMG_20250727_153451.webp
    aIMG_20250727_153451.webp
    38.4 KB · Views: 3
  • Like
Likes Astranut, pinball1970, collinsmark and 2 others
  • #3,018
History through a windshield :doh: o:)

aIMG_20250628_115126.webp
 
  • Like
Likes Astranut, pinball1970, Borg and 4 others
  • #3,019
I was waiting for the bus in an incredibly, remarkably boring place where there was nothing fun to shoot at all on the ground, so I turned my camera to the sky instead... :biggrin:

The sun behind clouds
Sun behind ckouds (1).webp


The sun behind clouds (panorama)
Sun behind ckouds (2).webp


(Gear: Sony A7R + Canon nFD 50mm f/1.4, and heavy gamma correction in Photoshop)
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Wow
Likes Astranut, Rive, jtbell and 7 others
  • #3,020
Trip to Texas to see family and the farm.
1753932009055.webp


1753932039717.webp

1753932073894.webp


1753932135510.webp


1753932172431.webp

1753932194527.webp

1753932381107.webp

1753932220899.webp
1753932237312.webp

My aunt says this is my great grandmother.
1753932268493.webp
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes Astranut, Rive, jtbell and 9 others
  • #3,021
"Monstrous" comes to mind..... Brundlefly, indeed :)

Untitled.webp


The mouthparts are particularly narsty, IMO.

Micro Nikkor 55mm at close focus, f/11. Crop is about 1.25:1, not quite a 1:1 crop.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Love
Likes Astranut, Rive, pinball1970 and 4 others
  • #3,022
Trip to Omaha (Nebraska, USA) to see family.

I brought two camera systems with me (besides cell phone).
  • Leica SL3 + Sigma 500mm f/5.6 DG DN Sports (aka., what I call "the bird lens") for birds and woodland* creatures
  • Leica M11-P + 3 lenses (28mm Thypoch Simera , 35mm Leica Summilux ASPH, 50mm Leica Summilux ASPH) for everything else.
*("woodland" here is just the overgrowth in the ditch between the neighborhood backyards and the adjacent highway. More on that in future posts.)

All photos in this particular post are with rangefinder camera (M11-P)

L1001745.webp

Figure 1. Pre-dawn, San Diego airport.

L1001748.webp

Figure 2. Another pre-dawn San Diego airport pic.

L1001755.webp

Figure 3. San Diego airport. I had some time to relax after checking my bag. The sun was trying to come up, but the marine layer was holding its ground.

L1001761.webp

Figure 4. Host station, Aviator's Sports Bar & Bar-B-Que, Terminal B, Denver airport.

L1001802.webp

Figure 5. Denver airport tram system. This had a real "Half-Life, chapter 8, 'On a Rail'" vibe to it. I was keeping a careful eye out for headcrabs and bullsquids (I did not pack a crowbar).

L1001803.webp

Figure 6. Airplane outside of Denver airport.

L1001808.webp

Figure 7. My first press of the shutter button in Nebraska for the year 2025.

More to come ...

(look forward to the Henry Doorly Zoo, Lake Cunningham, birds (lots of birds): including the unspoken bird coven**, and some other weird stuff.)

**(which isn't really a thing; I just made it up in my head for giggles.)
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes Astranut, Rive, jtbell and 3 others
  • #3,023
1753995004292.webp

1753995053326.webp

1753995680289.webp

1753995080602.webp

1753995128081.webp

Half-way down the line of gas pumps.

1753995826379.webp

The old house I was born in.

1753995878457.webp

Lot's of deer and wild hogs living on the back few hundred acres.
1753995622712.webp

1753995724998.webp


Sad story up the street from my mom's house in Dallas.
1753996001108.webp

 
  • Like
  • Care
Likes Astranut, Rive, jtbell and 5 others
  • #3,024
Three English footballers from Ashton all in the 1966 squad including Geoff Hurst.

IMG_20250729_193739_200~2.webp


Inverness.

IMG_20250801_171253_848~2.webp
 
  • Like
Likes Astranut, Rive, AlexB23 and 3 others
  • #3,025
Pole dancer at the bus stop
IMG_20250802_175022.webp
IMG_20250802_175106_1.webp
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes Astranut, Rive, nsaspook and 4 others
  • #3,026
nsaspook said:

So now you've experienced Buc-ee's, too!

They're looking to build a second one in SC, off I-85 near Anderson, but there's been some wrangling over state funding for improvements to the roads at the exit, so work hasn't started yet. There's now a sign along south/westbound I-85 approaching that exit, with the Buc-ee's logo and "234 miles".
 
  • #3,027
... Continuing the Nebraska trip:

Here's my first round of 2025 bird pics. Oh, and woodland creatures. By "woodland" here, I mean the overgrowth in the ditch between the neighborhood backyards and the highway. Many creatures call it home.

All the photos in this particular post were taken with the Leica SL3 + Sigma 500mm "bird lens".

L1000059.webp

Figure 1. Here's a dove on a pole (it's the pole for my Mom's bird feeder). There were several doves around this year. [I think it's a mourning dove (Zenaida macroura).]

L1000117-2.webp

Figure 2. My first Nebraska "woodland creature" pic for 2025. I'm pretty sure it's a cottontail rabbit of some type, maybe an eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus).

L1000003.webp

Figure 3. Here's my mom. It looks like I'm right next to her, but I'm not. I'm actually next door at my sister's place, awkwardly positioned on some outdoor deck furniture, leaning halfway over the 2nd floor deck railing to get the shot (anything to get the shot), before I swung the camera around to her. She's worried that I might fall off. The Sigma 500mm f/5.6 DG DN OS Sports lens (what I call "the bird lens") has a focal length not too dissimilar to my smaller telescope.

L1000215.webp

Figure 4. A female sparrow (or maybe a finch) on a pine tree.

L1000259.webp

Figure 5. Here's a male, house finch (Haemorhous mexicanus).

L1000311.webp

Figure 6. A dove (I think it's a different dove than before, still a "mourning dove" though).

L1000275.webp

Figure 7. The dove came over to check me out.

To be continued. ...
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes Astranut, pinball1970, Rive and 8 others
  • #3,028
Very nice photos, @collinsmark !

collinsmark said:
Figure 5. Here's a male, house finch (Haemorhous mexicanus).
Lovely colors on that bird! :kiss:
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
  • #3,029
collinsmark said:
Sigma 500mm f/5.6 DG DN OS
I took a look on the net about the lens, and it seems very impressive.
It seems it is very suitable for wildlife, and the quality of your photos show it. :smile:
I hope you'll enjoy it thoroughly! :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes AlexB23 and collinsmark
  • #3,030
Here's a waddling of ducks, on the way out.

IMG_6634.webp


Actually, I'd prefer "dabble of ducks", in a sort of similar vein to "gaggle of geese".
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes Astranut, Rive, TensorCalculus and 3 others
  • #3,031
Gig on Friday in Scotland, no time to get decent images of the breath taking scenery but our guitarist got this.
I tried but images were too dark/blurred.

527227417_1301264701497804_3495775022318021980_n-1.webp
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Wow
Likes Astranut, jtbell, BillTre and 6 others
  • #3,032
... Continued from a previous post (about the Nebraska trip)

I always have trouble telling the difference between finches and sparrows. My bird app does too (the CornellLab app), so I guess I'm not alone. Both bird species were in the area.

I try to use the idea that finches remind me of Billy Idol and sparrows don't. I'm not sure if that's really helpful though. (See my last post and future posts for more confident finch pics.)

I'll start with what I'm guessing are sparrows.

L1000471.webp

Figure 1. Female house sparrow (Passer domesticus)

L1000662.webp

Figure 2. Male house sparrow.

L1000636.webp

Figure 3. Another sparrow.

L1000467.webp

Figure 4. Female sparrow in direct sunlight.

Figure 4 shows one of the few photos I took of birds in mid-day direct sunlight. Statistically speaking, mid-day isn't the best time for bird photography. The harsh lighting isn't very flattering on the birds (statistically speaking).

More-so, birds are more active in the morning and evening: especially early morning blue hour (before the sun even comes up). Backlit bird photos can be quite dramatic at golden hour, if you can manage it (sometimes challenging, but possible). Then switch to more front-lighting for the rest of the morning. Save non-bird related errands and stuff for mid-day.

Most of the bird pics I took in this trip were mid-morning or evening, and birds were in the shade or there was partial cloud cover. Figure 4 is one of the exceptions.

L1000548.webp

Figure 5. A blue jay (Cyanocitta cristata)! This is new. There weren't any blue jays around last year (that I saw). This year there weren't many, but there was at least one. So, here it is.

Completely overcast skies don't make for great backgrounds (see Fig. 5), but since this is my only capture of a blue jay, I'll take it.

Speaking of changing bird populations, there weren't many robins around this year. Last year there were plenty, but this year there were noticeably fewer. I did manage to get a couple pics though (see Figs. 6 & 7).

L1000599.webp

Figure 6 American robin (Turdus migratorius).

L1000627.webp

Figure 7. Another robin pic. (I think it's the same robin as before).

L1010148.webp

Figure 8. Male, red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus). This is another new one. I didn't realize it was a blackbird until I was post-processing. When taking the picture I figured it was a grackle or crow of some-such. (No grackles this year.) But my bird app say's it's a blackbird. That's new for me (and the backyards). In retrospect, here, it kinda appears like some sort of fictional cyber-bird, but I'm sure that's just a trick of the lighting.

More to come ...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Likes Astranut, pinball1970, jtbell and 4 others
  • #3,033
Lovely photos, @collinsmark !

collinsmark said:
Figure 1. Female house sparrow (Passer domesticus)

collinsmark said:
Figure 2. Male house sparrow.

We've got them here in Sweden too, and it's a bird that is instantly reminding me of childhood, since there were many around where I lived. I really like them, but nowadays I sadly very seldom see them.

And it seems it is a very widespread bird:

House sparrow.webp


Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_sparrow
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970 and collinsmark
  • #3,034
Fishing boats on Naklua bay
IMG_20250804_152848.webp
IMG_20250804_122807.webp
IMG_20250804_123042.webp
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Astranut, pinball1970, jtbell and 3 others
  • #3,035
Some pictures from my trip to the Peak district :)
14314.webp
14173.webp

13938.webp
13941.webp

13933.webp
14152.webp
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Wow
Likes Astranut, pinball1970, morrobay and 5 others
  • #3,036
... Continued from my last post (the 2025 Nebraska trip).

L1000363.webp

Figure 1. Here's another pic of a mourning dove (Zenaida macroura).

L1000385.webp

Figure 2. Mourning dove.

L1000376.webp

Figure 3. Female house sparrow (Passer domesticus)

L1000401-2.webp

Figure 4. house sparrow in flight. Or it might be a finch (I think it's a sparrow).

L1000434.webp

Figure 5. Here's a good view of the tail of the eastern cottontail bunny (Sylvilagus floridanus).

L1000435.webp

Figure 6. Now here's a house finch for sure. (Haemorhous mexicanus). I'll name her "Billy." Then again I call all finches "Billy."

L1010161.webp

Figure 7. Is that little Billy? I think it's Billy. "Hello Billy!"

L1010185.webp

Figure 8. A young cottontail rabbit.

L1000517.webp

Figure 9. Squirrel. (A fox squirrel [Sciurus niger], probably?)

To be continued. ...
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Wow
Likes Astranut, pinball1970, jtbell and 5 others
  • #3,037
collinsmark said:
Sigma 500mm f/5.6 DG DN Sports
By the way, did you/do you shoot with it handheld, or did you use a tripod on some shots?
(I read a review of the lens so I understand that it has got image stabilization)

Edit: I also read that the weight of the lens is ca 1.3-1.5 kg and I suppose that is expected for a lens of that caliber. Do you feel the weight is manageable or is it a bit cumbersome, I wonder?

Edit 2: And from your lovely photos with great quality I can imagine you are having a great time with it. 🙂 I would probably myself be happy like a little child that just got a fantastic toy 😁.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
  • #3,038
DennisN said:
By the way, did you/do you shoot with it handheld, or did you use a tripod on some shots?
(I read a review of the lens so I understand that it has got image stabilization)

Edit: I also read that the weight of the lens is ca 1.3-1.5 kg and I suppose that is expected for a lens of that caliber. Do you feel the weight is manageable or is it a bit cumbersome, I wonder?

Edit 2: And from your lovely photos with great quality I can imagine you are having a great time with it. 🙂 I would probably myself be happy like a little child that just got a fantastic toy 😁.

All the shots with here were handheld. That said, it has a built in tripod shoe on which I used as a fulcrum atop the deck's hand-railing when I could (not always, but when the opportunity presented itself, I did). And yes, there is image stabilization that I used for every shot.

As far as its weight goes, it's not bad at all. Of course, it's only an f/5.6. But I find that to be about the perfect aperture for these bird shots anyway -- too much more than that and I'd start to have depth of field issues (this is arguable, though. Some might prefer an even narrower depth of field).

Years ago I used to use a Nikkor 200-400mm zoom (f/4 I think) and that thing was tough, handheld. I couldn't hold that handheld for more than half a minute before my arm would start shaking. I couldn't really do much with that lens without a tripod and bulky gimbal head. But this Sigma 500mm lens is a breath of fresh air by comparison.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, DennisN and berkeman
  • #3,039
... Continued from previous Nebraska-trip posts.

Took the rangefinder camera along with me while hanging out with friends and family in Omaha (mostly from in-law relationships through my sister).

L1001996.webp

Figure 1. Inflatable alpaca.

L1002381.webp

Figure 2. "Fish, clock, and lamp composition study."

L1002353.webp

Figure 3. "Yes, Magic Ball Plant. I am at your beck and call, Magic Ball Plant."

L1002383.webp

Figure 4. Some flowers outside.

L1002000.webp

Figure 5. "Yes, Magic Ball Plant. We are at your beck and call, Magic Ball Plant. We are in your eternal servitude, Magic Ball Plant."

Disclaimer: There are no such things as magic ball plants with mind control powers. There are no such things as sentient, inflatable alpacas (normal, non-sentient, inflatable alpacas notwithstanding. They're fine). I find it odd that I feel it even necessary to point this out. But if I don't, I fear some nincompoop might take the humor out of context and end up getting appointed to a federal cabinet position. These are the strange times in which we live.

L1002728.webp

Figure 6. Puppy!

L1002409.webp

Figure 7. Pool house in the evening.

L1001947.webp

Figure 8. "Untitled"
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Likes Astranut, pinball1970, Rive and 5 others
  • #3,040
.. Continued from Nebraska Trip.

'Decided to take a walk one day and check out the neighborhood.

L1002129.webp

Figure 1. A neighbor has a quaint little fence.

I almost didn't post Fig.1. It's on the borderline. There's something photogenic there, I think, but the perspective is a little off (close to my liking, but not quite). Maybe it would be better with a wider angle lens and getting up closer to the fence. But then I'd have to step off the public sidewalk, and onto their private property right next to their house, -- and all while having a camera in my hand -- and that put me in somewhat of a quandary. So I'll have to live with this picture for now (taken from the public sidewalk).

L1002165.webp

Figure 2. "What the... What the heck is goin' on in there?!"

This isn't our house, btw; it's just a house in the neighborhood (see Fig. 2). I've never met the people who live there.

The crepuscular rays are real; they're not photoshopped in or anything. They were actually there in real-life. But they're not directly above the house either: they originate from a section of sky/clouds far behind the house, regardless of what it looks like in the photo. (If you were to walk behind the house, you'd see them on the opposite side of the house, in the distance.)

We'll come back to this location another day in a future post. It'll be around sunset.

L1002181.webp

Figure 3. "Welp, that about wraps it up for today's walk."

Copy L1002290-Edit-2-Edit.webp

Figure 4. "2025's USA"
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes DennisN, Astranut, Rive and 4 others
  • #3,042
collinsmark said:
.. Continued from Nebraska Trip.

'Decided to take a walk one day and check out the neighborhood.

View attachment 364112
Figure 1. A neighbor has a quaint little fence.

I almost didn't post Fig.1. It's on the borderline. There's something photogenic there, I think, but the perspective is a little off (close to my liking, but not quite). Maybe it would be better with a wider angle lens and getting up closer to the fence. But then I'd have to step off the public sidewalk, and onto their private property right next to their house, -- and all while having a camera in my hand -- and that put me in somewhat of a quandary. So I'll have to live with this picture for now (taken from the public sidewalk).

View attachment 364113
Figure 2. "What the... What the heck is goin' on in there?!"

This isn't our house, btw; it's just a house in the neighborhood (see Fig. 2). I've never met the people who live there.

The crepuscular rays are real; they're not photoshopped in or anything. They were actually there in real-life. But they're not directly above the house either: they originate from a section of sky/clouds far behind the house, regardless of what it looks like in the photo. (If you were to walk behind the house, you'd see them on the opposite side of the house, in the distance.)

We'll come back to this location another day in a future post. It'll be around sunset.

View attachment 364114
Figure 3. "Welp, that about wraps it up for today's walk."

View attachment 364115
Figure 4. "2025's USA"
Those sky's are wow!
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
  • #3,043
pinball1970 said:
Those sky's are wow!

Yeah, skies in Nebraska are wild: ever changing and chaotic. Sometimes they're quite beautiful. And sometimes -- sometimes -- patches of sky can literally drop down and kill you. 'Crazy place, that Nebraska.
 
  • Like
Likes Borg and pinball1970
  • #3,044
... Continued Nebraska-trip pics:

I got the opportunity to wander aimlessly for a couple of hours at Lake Cunningham. I brought both my cameras.

As a child, we used to call it "Dam Site 11." Sounds weird in retrospect, but that's just what everybody called it. A great place without a fancy name. "Our family is going to have a picnic today out at Dam Site 11." "Oh, cool!! can I come?" That sort of thing.

When I became a teenager, people started calling it "Glenn Cunningham Lake." I would frequent the area on occasion, sometimes to do weekend, high school reading assignments (I read a good chunk of Bram Stoker's "Dracula" there). But mostly it was to covertly meet groups of friends and Boone's Farm.

Now it's just called "Lake Cunningham." References to "Dam Site 11" are difficult to find or gone these days. I'm not sure how I feel about that.

L1000817.webp

Figure 1. Canadian Goose (Branta canadensis).

L1000864.webp

Figure 2. Some sort of Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) I think.

I don't like my angle in the Mallard pic (See Fig. 2). They say when taking photos of birds in water, get as low as possible, such that your camera is just above the water. I didn't get low enough.

L1002208.webp

Figure 3. Lighthouse for the marina.

L1000782.webp

Figure 4. More Canadian geese.

If you were able to zoom in closely (you can't really do that on PF), you might notice that the central goose has a tag in its ankle/foot, probably for some sort of ornithological reason. But not all the Canadian geese had these tags.

L1000809.webp

Figure 5. One last Canadian goose. Notice no tag on its ankle.

L1002217.webp

Figure 6. Lake Cunningham.

While not in the above photo (see Fig. 6), the location where I was standing was littered with dog poop -- at least what I thought was dog poop at the time -- but it was probably goose poop. Lots of goose poop. I was wearing open-toed sandals that day and somehow managed not to step in any. Success!

L1002241.webp

Figure 7. "Dam Site 11" There. I called it that.

I think the above photo of the willow tree (See figure 7) is my favorite shot of the outing. I'm breaking a few "rules" of photographic composition here, in favor of other rules. I feel like a rebel.

L1002319.webp

Figure 8. "Nebraska field as seen from a moving vehicle." You can see a bit of blur in foreground corn rows due to the faster apparent motion of closer objects.

On the way home in the passenger seat of the car, I stopped down the aperture on the 50mm lens to f/5.6 or f/8 or some-such (I don't recall the specific value), adjusted the manual focus using the depth of field indicators engraved on the outside of the lens, to maximize depth of field for the given f/ stop (by aligning the infinity symbol with the chosen f/ stop).

Then I'd just put my camera up to the window, occasionally take a few shots (without even looking through the viewfinder), and hope for the best.

Above is one of the pictures that resulted (see Fig. 8). I think this one actually turned out pretty pleasing.

Unfortunately for dimwitted me, I neglected to manually increase the shutter speed. I don't know what I was thinking. I was in a moving car. Of course there's going to be motion blur. I knew that. But for whatever reason, adjusting the shutter speed appropriately just didn't cross my mind.

Funny thing is I was close to neglecting -- maybe even deleting -- this photo, before I gave the group a second or third look, and finally noticed that there might be something there with this one. None of the others came out well, mostly due to motion blur.

So if you ever use this technique,
  1. Stop down the aperture to get the depth of field you want.
  2. Adjust your focus accordingly (manual focus).
  3. Don't forget, like I did, to also increase your shutter speed well beyond what it would be for normal handheld photos. (Unless you actually want the motion blur of nearby objects.)
Oh, and don't do this while driving.

More Nebraska pics to come ...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Likes DennisN, pinball1970, Rive and 4 others
  • #3,045
Nome sweet Nome
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
  • #3,046
DOGE3500 said:
Nome sweet Nome
TH003109.webp
 
  • #3,047
Text unreadable. What say?
 
  • #3,048
symbolipoint said:
Text unreadable. What say?
something-something Farm Boundary 2013.
 
  • #3,049
symbolipoint said:
Text unreadable. What say?
It is a boundary marker for a property line at a wind farm north of Nome
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes symbolipoint and collinsmark
  • #3,050
... Round 4 of Nebraska bird and woodland creature pics.

L1000691.webp

Figure 1. Brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater).

L1000692.webp

Figure 2. Same brown-headed cowbird.

L1000913.webp

Figure 3. Bunny in direct sunlight (Sylvilagus floridanus).

L1000958.webp

Figure 4. "The bird-coven has been summoned. Gather immediately!"

L1000965.webp

Figure 5. "The bird-coven shall now commence the sacred tweet."

L1000973.webp

Figure 6. "'Sounds like those witchy sparrows at the neighbors' are at it again."

Disclaimer: There is no such thing as bird-based witchcraft. There are no actual things as magical bird-covens.

L1010006.webp

Figure 7. Red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus).

L1010072.webp

Figure 8. Male sparrow in a tree.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes Rive, morrobay, jtbell and 4 others

Similar threads

Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
35
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
31
Views
5K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Back
Top