Random Thoughts 7

  • Thread starter Thread starter Evo
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion in the "Random Thoughts 7" thread begins with a user expressing a desire to have the first civilian post. Participants reminisce about a missing member, Evo, and share their hopes for her well-being. The conversation shifts to humorous musings about chatbots and the origins of the term "robot," followed by reflections on pop culture, including reactions to Matthew Perry's passing. There are also light-hearted anecdotes about close encounters with deer while driving and observations on the challenges of transitioning from undergraduate to graduate studies. Overall, the thread captures a mix of nostalgia, humor, and personal experiences.
  • #1,921
Astronuc said:
That was that story I posted. I should have investigated further. The story is basically historical fiction as it included references to actual people, but there main narrative was fictitious. The story about the cook who purportedly develop acoustic damping/dampening is published on WWII Rising Stories, and there is a disclaimer comment:
How this was made
Altered or synthetic content. Sound or visuals were significantly edited or digitally generated.

It should indicate AI-generated narrative. There are various channels like WWII Rising Stories that create 'historical fiction'.

If one listens to the narrative, one hears mention of Convoy HX 229, which is an actual convoy, and reference to German (Kriegsmarine) U-boat U758, which is an actual submarine that attacked Convoy HX 229.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convoys_HX_229/SC_122#Convoy_HX_229
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_submarine_U-758#Second_patrol

In the beginning of the video, one hears reference to merchant ship SS William Eustis (an actual ship) on which Thomas (Tommy) Patrick Lawson is supposedly serving as cook. SS William Eustis was part of HX 229, and it was hit by a torpedo from Kriegsmarine U435 on 22 March 1943.

https://uboat.net/allies/merchants/ship/2796.html

There was a Professor Patrick Blackett, but it is not clear that he did research in underwater acoustics; he did serve in the Royal Navy during WWI.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_Blackett#Early_life_and_education
During WWII, Blakcett worked with experimental physicist Evan James Williams to address merchant convoy survivability and the U-boat menace.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_Blackett#World_War_II_and_operational_research

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evan_James_Williams

Rear-Admiral Leonard Murray is an actual person
https://www.canada.ca/en/navy/corporate/history-heritage/canadian-naval-heroes/leonard-murray.html


So there are historical facts weaved into a fictional narrative. I'm not sure how a cook onboard a ship and sitting in a noisy engine room could hear how ships sound underwater. One might be able to hear noise of ships through the hull, but one would have to be distant from the engine room and propulsion systems of one's own ship. I do not think a cook would have access to a hydrophone, nor would a merchant ship necessarily be deploying a hydrophone.
. Maybe this will help, at least with the video aspects.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes symbolipoint, OmCheeto and Astronuc
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #1,922
WWGD said:
. Maybe this will help, at least with the video aspects.

Sorry to laugh, but her first point, 'Think', seems to me to be beyond a lot of people's abilities today.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes WWGD, Astronuc and collinsmark
  • #1,923
Borg said:
I know but I didn't want to throw you under the bus.
I bear plenty of tread marks, one more won't matter much.
 
  • #1,924
IMHO there's but one word you need to sort wheat from chaff: "debunk".
 
  • #1,925
I wish more conspiracy buffs knew and used that word.
 
  • #1,926
OmCheeto said:
Sorry to laugh, but her first point, 'Think', seems to me to be beyond a lot of people's abilities today.

I can't even listen to hear. I'd have to slow playing speed considerably to be able to.
 
  • #1,927
sbrothy said:
I wish more conspiracy buffs knew and used that word.
Wasn't that a song: We need debunk...?
 
  • #1,928
WWGD said:
Wasn't that a song: We need the bunk...?
Close:
 
  • #1,929
Hmm.. possibly...?

Maybe Trump should hear it. No wait: "bunk", not "debunk"! :woot:
 
  • #1,930
"defunk"! o0)
 
  • #1,931
Would be a good idea if the band Yes wrote a song, album, titled " No". " Who wrote " No"? Yes. To Yes members: Did you write No? Yes.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11K
Views
571K
  • · Replies 3K ·
89
Replies
3K
Views
161K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
348
  • · Replies 2K ·
76
Replies
2K
Views
172K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4K ·
134
Replies
4K
Views
238K
  • · Replies 113 ·
4
Replies
113
Views
9K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K