Great thread idea!
Sophia said:
Now I am happy with the combination of Linux for security and AdBlock plus. It is the right balance between security and usability for me.
I also rely on Linux for personal use. I used to be a Windows user; but too many factors coalesced (efficiency when it comes to use of hardware resources, control over the OS, cost, business philosophy, and hubris with regards to the rights and needs of customers / users), and I decided to give Linux a try (which you can do without even installing Linux - a so-called LiveCD will load in memory and provide a barebones experience, without needing to reside on the hard drive). I scrapped Windows that same day and started using Linux, and have not looked back since. I also use a few privacy-minded extensions in Firefox and am overall quite pleased. A small degree of tracking / profiling is something I can live with, as it does help web-based companies develop and deliver a higher quality service and experience. I also have nothing worth hiding on my computer - for me it is more the issue that I simply prefer to retain control over what I share or do not share. That being said, AdBlock, NoScript, and my browser set to open in private mode work well enough for me. Browser empties on close. I don't mind manually allowing scripts when a page loads - it's still faster than dial-up.
Sophia said:
I don't want to sound like a Linux preacher here. Obviously, there are pros and cons to each OS. It's important to say that many games and some professional programs run only on Windows.
With WINE installed on Linux, you can run a fair amount of Windows programs, to include games. In some cases, gamers have actually reported a performance increase when playing a Microsoft game on Linux using WINE ... that this setup, using a middle man, is as fast or even faster than playing directly on Windows, is a testament to how efficient Linux can be when it comes to using hardware. Then there is also Steam for gaming enthusiasts. The problem with WINE, though, is that at least in theory, Windows-based viruses run over it just as well as any other software written for Microsoft products. I don't game, and I don't use the Windows Emulator; so my experience here is limited to what I have read in various Linux forums.
Psinter said:
The problem I find with most popular linux distribution like Ubuntu, Kubuntu is that they always introduce the last cutting edge technology that is always full of bugs and non-working (too many broken things). I was incredibly happy with my Kubuntu 14.04, but suddenly I could not download packages anymore because it said the sources could not be found so I upgraded. Fatal Error. The new KDE is so full of bugs and I couldn't even launch a terminal.
Cutting edge distros always have something that breaks and makes your life impossible.
First I abandoned Ubuntu because of Unity full of bugs and moved to Kubuntu (I still tried Ubuntu later when Unity was more stable, but I still didn't like it). Then I recently abandoned Kubuntu because the new KDE is so full of bugs (I may try it again when it is more stable). Now I'm looking for something else that is stable.
Upgrades are optional with Linux ... I usually stay on the bleeding edge, though. I back up personal data before upgrading, and prefer to do a clean installation from a disk I've burned with data integrity I've verified before and after the burning process. I also keep in mind what one of my instructors taught me in school, that there are only two kinds of data that exist: the data one has lost, and the data one has not lost yet. That having been said, the new Kubuntu releases I've worked with do seem to have a bit of bugginess to them. I switched from Ubuntu to Kubuntu after about six months of use, as it was a little too much like Windows in a few ways. I love Kubuntu / KDE, and as long as I have my personal data backed up, I can handle the occasional re-install of the operating system ... it takes nearly no time at all to install a functioning and fully-updated OS, especially when compared to Windows. I also enjoy tinkering quite a lot, as it helps me better understand what I have in front of me.
Sophia said:
Where will development of home computers /electronic lead?
What I mean is that after watching several reviews of computers, some tablets and recently kindle readers it seems like the difference between older and newer generations is not so big for mainstream consumers who only want to browse the Internet, use office and watch videos.
The resolution of screens had reached the point where human eye can't see the difference in higher resolution. Browsing the Internet has become reasonably fast.
What will persuade/ force this type of customer to buy new models each couple of years when they can do all they want on older machines?
What features will attract them in the future? Or will they be forced to buy new machines as only limited storage will be offered and short - lived non removable battery will eventually make the device unusable?
This is only anecdotal, but it seems that domestic appliances such as fridges or washing machines are built to last for a limited amount of time. Definitely shorter time than used to be in the past.
Will this be the scenario for electronics as well? Or will the developers invent new features to make non-gamer, non-teenager (who suffer from peer pressure) users want to buy new stuff?
Disposability is a business model. Some companies want you to throw away your older products for newer ones, as it increases their revenue. Factors that tech companies use to justify steady upgrades (and with many companies, it's important to point out that these factors are legitimate) include security, stability, and energy / resource efficiency. Personally, I have no problem with this in theory; but in practice, I feel not enough is being done with regards to recycling.
Psinter said:
Here is something about it (and a math professor has something to say about it):
http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-35639549
I googled and found various people talking about the same thing. It is clear beyond reasonable doubt that it can happen. Programmers know it can happen and it is a
reproducible event to the extent of recognizing the words that has been spoken. Just sit down, open Android Studio and write a program to make it do what is being described. But as to it actually happening, I don't know. So in resume: It can happen, but Google rejects the idea of
it happening when it responded.
...
You are not paranoid. Your worry is legitimate.
I agree 100%.
Sophia said:
I did a small experiment. I took the phone and talked for a long time about something with high commercial value that I normally never talk about and I have never googled it. I will repeat those words a couple of times and see if it works. It probably won't do anything, but I was bored and curious :-)
I'll also have a look at Denningers blog.
Thus the mind of a true scientist is revealed :-)