dkotschessaa
- 1,063
- 763
Woohoo. I'm signed up for 6 private lessons of Tai Chi.
Prepare for very gentle butt whoopings!
Prepare for very gentle butt whoopings!
I started it karate at one point but drop it after like a week. All I remember is how to do the shouting.dkotschessaa said:Woohoo. I'm signed up for 6 private lessons of Tai Chi.
Prepare for very gentle butt whoopings!
zoobyshoe said:Someone just linked to this painting on Facebook. I found it to be spooky. It's called, "Euglena."
View attachment 93324
"flagellate protists" sounds like a cult, maybe a sexual one. Editr: BTW, it is possible to use standard words to write a Math paper called: "Ball-packing in Fock spaces of Tight Curvature". I may just use the title for the next one I write.jim hardy said:
A wide spread one: single cell sex! Not to be confused with sex sells. Btw: when did we switch from simple cell division to sexual reproduction and who is to blame?WWGD said:"flagellate protists" sounds like a cult, maybe a sexual one.
Don't blame it on me, I just wrote the post!fresh_42 said:A wide spread one: single cell sex! Not to be confused with sex sells. Btw: when did we switch from simple cell division to sexual reproduction and who is to blame?
I blame zygotes.fresh_42 said:A wide spread one: single cell sex! Not to be confused with sex sells. Btw: when did we switch from simple cell division to sexual reproduction and who is to blame?
Temperature at the North Pole is -15F, -26 C . EDITzoobyshoe said:Current temperature at the South Pole: -20 F, -29 C.
Unfortunately the word 'theory', while having a definite meaning in science - as an coherent explanation of something,WWGD said:I... theorist used in the loosest possible sense of someone having a theory ...
Seriously, the word is abused so much these days.rootone said:Unfortunately the word 'theory', while having a definite meaning in science - as an coherent explanation of something,
it is also commonly used in general conversion to mean just 'an idea', no matter how crazy and unsupportable it may be.
Yes! One of the most favorite replies I've read on online discussions about evolution was: "It is only a theory. Not proven." You can fill entertaining evenings upsetting the trolls.rootone said:Unfortunately the word 'theory', while having a definite meaning in science - as an coherent explanation of something,
it is also commonly used in general conversion to mean just 'an idea', no matter how crazy and unsupportable it may be.
WWGD said:Yes, Evolution " Is just a theory". I think this is formally called a fallacy of equivocation.
The fallacy of equivocation occurs when a key term or phrase in an argument is used in an ambiguous way, with one meaning in one portion of the argument and then another meaning in another portion of the argument.
rootone said:Use a USB cable?, but then you might not have one with the right connector at both ends.
How about wireless printing?dkotschessaa said:Indeed, the meaning of the word "universal" seems to have been lost on all the people making USB cables.
Yes, and in this case it is first used colloquially, as in everyday language and then it is used in its more formal way. So I think it does fall into that category of equivocation. Like one I hear or read a while back: "My Achilles heel is not my Achilles heel" , with the first one used figuratively and the second one used literally, as in the body part. Without explanation, it seems like a contradiction: A is not A..zoobyshoe said:Example: "It is false to claim feathers are lighter than canon balls, because a black bird's feather reflects much less light than a canon ball, and actually appears much darker."
Ibix said:There seems to me to be a general problem with the clash between technical and colloquial language. It just hits science hard because there are substantial lobbies with little interest in reality - so evolution is "just a theory" and "chemicals are bad for you".
I once saw a "man in the street interview" with someone who didn't want to eat GM products because they have genes in.
Exactly. Real clean food only comes out of plants!Ibix said:I once saw a "man in the street interview" with someone who didn't want to eat GM products because they have genes in.
Ibix said:There seems to me to be a general problem with the clash between technical and colloquial language. It just hits science hard because there are substantial lobbies with little interest in reality - so evolution is "just a theory" and "chemicals are bad for you".
I once saw a "man in the street interview" with someone who didn't want to eat GM products because they have genes in.