Ranking Rotational Inertia Task

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on ranking the rotational inertias of four structures based on their mass distribution relative to their axes of rotation. The correct ranking, as determined through the application of the parallel axis theorem, is b > a > d > c. Key insights include the importance of mass distance from the axis of rotation and the technique of cancelling equivalent contributions to simplify comparisons. The parallel axis theorem is essential for understanding the relationship between the moment of inertia and the axis of rotation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rotational inertia concepts
  • Familiarity with the parallel axis theorem
  • Basic knowledge of mass distribution in physical structures
  • Ability to analyze structures based on their rotational axes
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the parallel axis theorem in detail
  • Explore examples of calculating rotational inertia for various shapes
  • Learn about the relationship between mass distribution and rotational dynamics
  • Investigate practical applications of rotational inertia in engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and rotational dynamics, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to rotational inertia.

B3NR4Y
Gold Member
Messages
170
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


I'm given the following four structures with their rotational axes marked, I have to rank them from largest to smallest rotational inertias, I have trouble with that apparently.
QBxEISS.png


Homework Equations


No equations are really necessary, just my book says the more mass there is on one side of the rotation axis, the higher the rotational inertia.

The Attempt at a Solution


I gave the following four answers
a>b>d=c (Before I read the chapter, just using intuition)
a>b>d>c
a>b>c>d (again before I read the chapter, at this point I realized I was completely off)
c=d>b>a (I said c and d are equal because the mass they both separate is about equal, and b is greater than a because it seems it would be "harder" to rotate about that axis then a, a would rotate freely, b would have a bit of trouble, c and d would balance)

Am I thinking about this all wrong (yes)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can compare a with c and b with d easily by using the parallel axis theorem (but it should also be reasonably intuitive). Comparing a with b and c with d is somewhat harder. I don't find it intuitively obvious. One trick you can use is to cancel out equivalent contributors. E.g., the horizontal member of b cancels one vertical member of a.
 
It is not a matter of how much is on each side, it is a matter of how far away from the axis of rotation the mass is. Haruspex' suggestion of cancelling equivalent contributions is a good one (I assume all bars are to be considered as having the same length and mass).
 
Orodruin said:
It is not a matter of how much is on each side, it is a matter of how far away from the axis of rotation the mass is. Haruspex' suggestion of cancelling equivalent contributions is a good one (I assume all bars are to be considered as having the same length and mass).
Yeah I read my professor's lecture notes for today (these exercises are prelecture so he knows where we stand, but they're graded on accuracy so I try to get right) and my task here made more sense. I got b>a>d>c, which I think is right. However I do not know the parallel axis theorem, or I have never given it a name. What is that?
 
B3NR4Y said:
Yeah I read my professor's lecture notes for today (these exercises are prelecture so he knows where we stand, but they're graded on accuracy so I try to get right) and my task here made more sense. I got b>a>d>c, which I think is right. However I do not know the parallel axis theorem, or I have never given it a name. What is that?
Yes, I get that answer too.
For present purposes, the parallel axis theorem tells you that the moment of inertia about an axis through the mass centre (as in c and d) is less than about any other axis parallel to it. This tells you a > c and b > d. It remains to compare a and d. For those, you can cancel the horizontal of d with the two lower halves of the verticals in a, and the horizontal of a with one vertical of d. For what's left, it should be evident that a > d.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K