Rao-Blackwells Theorem: Efficient Estimation Using Sufficient Statistics

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zaare
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Zaare
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
Given the facts

1. X_1 ,...,X_n are independent and have the same distribution.

2. The expectation value of X_i is E\left( {X_i } \right) = \theta.

3. T=\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {X_i } is a sufficient statistic.

I'm asked to find an astimate for \theta starting with the estimate U=X_1.

According to Rao-Blackwells theorem, the new estimate is taken as g(t)=E(U|T=t).

I don't know how to calculate this expression further. Any help or tip would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would calculate the sum of the expectation value of X_i conditioned on the sufficient statistic. That sum can then be equated to n*g(t).
 
Ok, I think I get it. You mean I should calculate this:
\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {E\left( {X_i |T = t} \right)}

And that would equal this:
ng(t)=nE(U|T=t)=nE(X_1|T=t)
 
Last edited:
Yes, simplify the top expression, and it should become pretty clear. Your final answer should not surprise you.
 
No, you're right. I got the arithmetic mean. Hopefully that's what you meant and I haven't done something very wrong.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top