Rate at which things appear smaller and establishing a baseline

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter LykosPF4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rate
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding visual perspective and the rate at which objects appear smaller as they move away from the observer. Participants explore concepts related to visual angles, apparent lengths, and the implications for astronomical measurements.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about how to measure the rate at which objects appear smaller, suggesting a baseline measurement with a 1 meter object held 1 meter away.
  • Another participant mentions techniques developed by astronomers for measuring small angles, indicating that the apparent size of distant stars is estimated through indirect methods.
  • A participant introduces the concept of solid angles and provides a formula for calculating the angle subtended by an object at a distance, suggesting its relevance to the discussion.
  • Further, a participant proposes a hypothetical scenario involving two rulers at different distances to illustrate the concept of apparent size, questioning how much smaller the propped-up ruler appears compared to the one held in hand.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the specific rate at which objects appear smaller or how to quantify it. Multiple viewpoints and approaches are presented, indicating an unresolved nature of the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations in establishing visual angles and measurements, as well as the dependence on assumptions regarding distances and perspectives.

LykosPF4
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, everyone!

To be honest, I don't know that this is a math question or what field of science and math can help understand this, so this is my first try to ask others on the subject. Here it goes.

For a while now, I've been trying to understand visual perspective. Things get smaller as they move away, that's true, but what is the rate at which they appear smaller? One thing I felt was necessary was creating a baseline such as holding a 1 meter long object 1 meter away from my eyes. From there, you could say that

1 meter appears to be "l" meters long, where l<1
at d meters away from the baseline where d>0.

The only problem with that on paper is that I realize I really have no way of establishing visual angles. If I draw out my possible baseline, I cannot determine accurately measurements or field of vision a 1 meter long object takes up. 20°, 30°, 40°? I don't know.

One thing that comes out of this is calling out apparent lengths or how long something looks to be at a certain distance away. Like if you looked at the sun (with PROPER radiation blocking equipment!) it appears like a very tiny circle even though it is gargantuan. But if I hold out a penny in front of my face 2 feet away, how much smaller is the sun to the penny?

I don't know really if this has any function in real life, but it seems like it has some astronomical function that may already be in place, else we couldn't be determining the incredibly massive sizes of stars that are nearly as large as our our solar system. So this is why I'm wondering if this belonged in physics or astronomy as well.

- -- --- -- - -- --- -- - -- --- -- - -- --- -- - -- --- -- - -- --- -- - -- --- -- - -- --- -- -

Does anyone have an idea what I'm talking about? Surely someone has attempted such concepts before me. If I need to draw any of this out on paper, let me know.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi LykosPF4,

I'm not sure what you are asking. Are you asking how to measure small angles, like the width of a penny at a distance of a mile? If so, the astronomers (I am not one) have been working at this for a long time and have developed techniques for measuring really small angles. For example, these guys claim to be able to measure small angles to a resolution of 2.2 x 10^-6 radian: http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?uri=ao-43-29-5438
I am sure if you asked this question in an astronomy forum someone could give you a much better answer than I. However, the disk of a distant star makes far too small an angle for us to measure directly from earth, so estimates of its size must be based on some other means of measurement.

With respect to your question about the size of a penny at two feet versus the apparent size of the sun, it may help to know about solid angles: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid_angle
 
One more note, which you may already know. The length s of an arc subtended by an angle of [itex]\theta[/itex] radians on a circle of radius r is [itex]s = r \theta[/itex]; so [itex]\theta = s / r[/itex]. You can use this to compute the angle subtended by a penny at a distance of a a mile, for example.
 
awkward said:
One more note, which you may already know. The length s of an arc subtended by an angle of [itex]\theta[/itex] radians on a circle of radius r is [itex]s = r \theta[/itex]; so [itex]\theta = s / r[/itex]. You can use this to compute the angle subtended by a penny at a distance of a a mile, for example.


Thank you. I'll see where this can go in the Astronomy forum as well as the equation you gave me. What I'm trying to determine is the rate at which things appear smaller as they move further away. the length of a 12" ruler never gets smaller, but it appears smaller as it moves away. I guess if I created a word problem, it may make more sense! Haha all those years in math courses and now I'm the one created word problems.

Let's say my arms are 2 feet long. I have 2 rulers that are 12 inches long each. Let's place one ruler propped up at eye level 4 feet from my eyes. I then hold up the other ruler 2 feet from my eyes and just far enough below the propped up ruler using my arms such that I can see both rulers simultaneously. How many inches would the propped up ruler take up on the ruler in my hands?

One must assume the propped up ruler takes up less than 12 inches on my in hand ruler, but I don't know how to do that yet. I'll see what I can do with your equation.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
5K