Rate of Change: Bees in Wildflower Meadow (a-c)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the mathematical modeling of the rate of change of bees per wildflower plant, specifically using the equation dB/dF = (2 - 3sin(3t))/(5e^(0.1t)). At t=4, the calculated rate is 0.4839, but for t>12, the number of bees per ten plants drops to three, indicating a significant decline. The model's limitations are highlighted, particularly its failure to account for seasonal variations, suggesting that a more accurate model should incorporate these factors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically derivatives
  • Familiarity with mathematical modeling techniques
  • Knowledge of seasonal ecological patterns
  • Proficiency in interpreting mathematical equations and their implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research seasonal modeling techniques in ecological studies
  • Learn about advanced mathematical modeling in population dynamics
  • Explore the implications of significant figures in scientific calculations
  • Investigate alternative equations for modeling growth rates in ecological systems
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for ecologists, mathematicians, and researchers involved in population dynamics, particularly those interested in the interactions between pollinators and flowering plants.

chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,828
Reaction score
423
Homework Statement
See attached.
Relevant Equations
differentiation
1686666885968.png


part (a)

The number of Bees per Wildflower plant.

part (b)

##\dfrac{dB}{dF}= \dfrac{dB}{dt} ⋅\dfrac{dt}{dF}####\dfrac{dB}{dF}=\left[\dfrac{2-3\sin 3t}{5e^{0.1t}}\right]##

##\dfrac{dB}{dF} (t=4)= 0.4839##part (c)

For values of ##t>12## The number of Bees per wildflower plants reduces drastically at 3 bees per 10 plants (number of bees are becoming insignificant)...that may not be a true representation of the model.Insight welcome...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't checked your numbers, but I don't see anything wrong with your work, otherwise.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chwala
chwala said:
part (b)
.
##\dfrac{dB}{dF} (t=4)= 0.4839##
You can’t justify giving the answer to four significant figures. The parameters in the equations are only precise to one sig. fig. I'd round to two sig. figs. as a compromise.

chwala said:
part (c)

For values of ##t>12## The number of Bees per wildflower plants reduces drastically at 3 bees per 10 plants (number of bees are becoming insignificant)...that may not be a true representation of the model.
I think what they are getting at is this...

The question states that the data are acquired during a number of weeks over summer. During summer the number of wildflowers can reasonably be expected to steadily increase. But after 12 weeks (t>12) we will have entered autumn and the number of wildflowers will be decreasing. This is not correctly modelled by ##F(t) = e^{0.1t}##.

An improved version of ##F(t)## might include seasonal variations over a complete year.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: chwala
Part a: the rate of change of number of bees with number of plants. Note that dB/dt can be negative, but you don't have negative bees per plant.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS, chwala and Steve4Physics

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K