Rate of Change: Bees in Wildflower Meadow (a-c)

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between the number of bees and wildflower plants, specifically analyzing the rate of change of bees per wildflower. The calculation for the rate of change at t=4 yields approximately 0.4839, but there are concerns about the precision of this result due to the parameters being only accurate to one significant figure. After t=12, the model suggests a drastic reduction in bee numbers, which may not accurately reflect real-world conditions as seasonal changes are not accounted for. It is suggested that an improved model should incorporate seasonal variations to better represent the dynamics of wildflower growth and bee populations throughout the year. Overall, the current model may misrepresent bee populations as it fails to consider the decline in wildflowers in autumn.
chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,827
Reaction score
415
Homework Statement
See attached.
Relevant Equations
differentiation
1686666885968.png


part (a)

The number of Bees per Wildflower plant.

part (b)

##\dfrac{dB}{dF}= \dfrac{dB}{dt} ⋅\dfrac{dt}{dF}####\dfrac{dB}{dF}=\left[\dfrac{2-3\sin 3t}{5e^{0.1t}}\right]##

##\dfrac{dB}{dF} (t=4)= 0.4839##part (c)

For values of ##t>12## The number of Bees per wildflower plants reduces drastically at 3 bees per 10 plants (number of bees are becoming insignificant)...that may not be a true representation of the model.Insight welcome...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't checked your numbers, but I don't see anything wrong with your work, otherwise.
 
chwala said:
part (b)
.
##\dfrac{dB}{dF} (t=4)= 0.4839##
You can’t justify giving the answer to four significant figures. The parameters in the equations are only precise to one sig. fig. I'd round to two sig. figs. as a compromise.

chwala said:
part (c)

For values of ##t>12## The number of Bees per wildflower plants reduces drastically at 3 bees per 10 plants (number of bees are becoming insignificant)...that may not be a true representation of the model.
I think what they are getting at is this...

The question states that the data are acquired during a number of weeks over summer. During summer the number of wildflowers can reasonably be expected to steadily increase. But after 12 weeks (t>12) we will have entered autumn and the number of wildflowers will be decreasing. This is not correctly modelled by ##F(t) = e^{0.1t}##.

An improved version of ##F(t)## might include seasonal variations over a complete year.
 
Part a: the rate of change of number of bees with number of plants. Note that dB/dt can be negative, but you don't have negative bees per plant.
 
  • Like
Likes SammyS, chwala and Steve4Physics

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K