Rate of Change: Bees in Wildflower Meadow (a-c)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the rate of change of the number of bees per wildflower plant, exploring mathematical modeling and assumptions related to seasonal variations in a wildflower meadow context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the derivative of the number of bees with respect to the number of wildflowers and question the accuracy of the model beyond a certain time frame. There are considerations about significant figures in reporting results and the implications of seasonal changes on the model.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the mathematical expressions and questioning the assumptions underlying the model. Some have offered insights into potential inaccuracies related to seasonal effects, while others have raised points about the precision of numerical results.

Contextual Notes

There are discussions about the limitations of the model, particularly regarding the behavior of wildflower populations over time and the implications of transitioning from summer to autumn on the number of bees per wildflower plant.

chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,828
Reaction score
425
Homework Statement
See attached.
Relevant Equations
differentiation
1686666885968.png


part (a)

The number of Bees per Wildflower plant.

part (b)

##\dfrac{dB}{dF}= \dfrac{dB}{dt} ⋅\dfrac{dt}{dF}####\dfrac{dB}{dF}=\left[\dfrac{2-3\sin 3t}{5e^{0.1t}}\right]##

##\dfrac{dB}{dF} (t=4)= 0.4839##part (c)

For values of ##t>12## The number of Bees per wildflower plants reduces drastically at 3 bees per 10 plants (number of bees are becoming insignificant)...that may not be a true representation of the model.Insight welcome...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't checked your numbers, but I don't see anything wrong with your work, otherwise.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chwala
chwala said:
part (b)
.
##\dfrac{dB}{dF} (t=4)= 0.4839##
You can’t justify giving the answer to four significant figures. The parameters in the equations are only precise to one sig. fig. I'd round to two sig. figs. as a compromise.

chwala said:
part (c)

For values of ##t>12## The number of Bees per wildflower plants reduces drastically at 3 bees per 10 plants (number of bees are becoming insignificant)...that may not be a true representation of the model.
I think what they are getting at is this...

The question states that the data are acquired during a number of weeks over summer. During summer the number of wildflowers can reasonably be expected to steadily increase. But after 12 weeks (t>12) we will have entered autumn and the number of wildflowers will be decreasing. This is not correctly modelled by ##F(t) = e^{0.1t}##.

An improved version of ##F(t)## might include seasonal variations over a complete year.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: chwala
Part a: the rate of change of number of bees with number of plants. Note that dB/dt can be negative, but you don't have negative bees per plant.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS, chwala and Steve4Physics

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K