1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Homework Help: Related Rates / Calculating Rate of Change

  1. May 1, 2012 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    A lake is polluted by water from a plant located on its shore. Ecologist determine that when the level of pollutant is x parts per million (ppm), there will be F fish in the lake. When there are 4,000 fish in the lake, the pollution is increasing at a rate of 1.4ppm/year. At what rate is the fish population changing at that time?

    2. Relevant equations

    F = [itex]\frac{32,000}{3+\sqrt{x}}[/itex]

    3. The attempt at a solution

    Ok so if I understand correctly, Im trying to find the change in F over the change in time (one year) or:[itex]\frac{dF}{dt}[/itex]. They give me [itex]\frac{dx}{dt}[/itex] = 1.4. But I dont know how to use that to find [itex]\frac{dF}{dt}[/itex]. Any ideas?
  2. jcsd
  3. May 1, 2012 #2


    Staff: Mentor

    Use the chain rule: dF/dt = dF/dx * dx/dt.
  4. May 1, 2012 #3
    I tried that, but isnt the derivative of F just equal to 1? I really cant understand this problem. Its on the practice test for our upcoming final and I have never even seen anything like it before. But I really would like to understand it in case something like it shows up on our final though.

    Cause Ive used that form before for like price elasticity when [itex]\frac{dx}{dp}[/itex] * [itex]\frac{p}{x}[/itex]. But i dont understand how it would work here.

    And by the way, this is a related rates problem right? And not an exponential growth model?
  5. May 1, 2012 #4


    Staff: Mentor

    No. Show me how you calculated dF/dx.
  6. May 1, 2012 #5


    Staff: Mentor

    Yes, this is a related rates problem.

    You are given the relationship between pollution level x and the number of fish F, and need to find the rate at which the fish population is changing, dF/dt.
  7. May 1, 2012 #6
    Oh I see, [itex]\frac{df}{dx}[/itex] = [itex]\frac{-3x^{-3/2}}{2}[/itex]? So [itex]\frac{df}{dx}[/itex] * [itex]\frac{dx}{dt}[/itex] = [itex]\frac{-3x^{-3/2}}{2}[/itex] * 1.4?
  8. May 1, 2012 #7


    Staff: Mentor

    Just how did you go from
    F = 32000/(3 + √x)

    to dF/dx = (-3/2)x-3/2?

    Also, you are treating dx/dt as if it were a constant (1.4). It isn't. This is the rate of change of pollutant at a particular time, the time when there are 4,000 fish. You will also need to figure out what the value of x is at this same time.
  9. May 1, 2012 #8
    I derived it. 32000 & 3 are constants so they cancel out and you are left with 1/[itex]\sqrt{x}[/itex] with is 1/x[itex]^{\frac{1}{2}}[/itex] which is just x[itex]^{\frac{-1}{2}}[/itex] Then you add one to the exponent and multiply it in front of x which gives you (-3/2)x[itex]^{-3/2}[/itex].

    Oh ok, so I rewrite the original equation in terms of x in order to find out how many pollutants are in the lake when there are 4000 fish.

    That gives me (3+[itex]\sqrt{x}[/itex])*(4000) = 32000. Which simplifies to x = 25 ([itex]\sqrt{x}[/itex] = 5) Is that right?
  10. May 1, 2012 #9


    Staff: Mentor

    You're kidding, right?

    What you said is so incorrect, it's hard to know what to tell you.

    What differentiation rules have you heard of?

    BTW, you don't "derive" a function - you differentiate it to get the derivative.
    At least you're on the right track, but x = 25 and √x = 5 are both incorrect.

    x does not represent the number of pollutants in the lake - presumably there is one pollutant. x represents the parts per million of that pollutant.
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook