Related Rates / Calculating Rate of Change

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a lake's fish population in relation to the level of pollution from a nearby plant. The relationship between the number of fish, F, and the pollution level, x (in parts per million), is given by a specific equation. The task is to determine the rate of change of the fish population when the pollution is increasing at a known rate.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of the chain rule to relate the rates of change of fish population and pollution level. There are attempts to clarify the derivative of F and its application in this context. Questions arise regarding the nature of the problem, whether it is a related rates problem or an exponential growth model.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on using the chain rule and have engaged in discussions about the differentiation process. There is an ongoing exploration of the relationship between the variables involved, with some participants questioning the calculations and assumptions made regarding the derivatives and the values of x and F.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem is part of a practice test for an upcoming final, indicating a need for clarity and understanding of the concepts involved. There is also mention of confusion regarding the definitions and roles of the variables in the given equation.

JacksonSolo
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A lake is polluted by water from a plant located on its shore. Ecologist determine that when the level of pollutant is x parts per million (ppm), there will be F fish in the lake. When there are 4,000 fish in the lake, the pollution is increasing at a rate of 1.4ppm/year. At what rate is the fish population changing at that time?

Homework Equations



F = [itex]\frac{32,000}{3+\sqrt{x}}[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok so if I understand correctly, I am trying to find the change in F over the change in time (one year) or:[itex]\frac{dF}{dt}[/itex]. They give me [itex]\frac{dx}{dt}[/itex] = 1.4. But I don't know how to use that to find [itex]\frac{dF}{dt}[/itex]. Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JacksonSolo said:

Homework Statement



A lake is polluted by water from a plant located on its shore. Ecologist determine that when the level of pollutant is x parts per million (ppm), there will be F fish in the lake. When there are 4,000 fish in the lake, the pollution is increasing at a rate of 1.4ppm/year. At what rate is the fish population changing at that time?

Homework Equations



F = [itex]\frac{32,000}{3+\sqrt{x}}[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok so if I understand correctly, I am trying to find the change in F over the change in time (one year) or:[itex]\frac{dF}{dt}[/itex]. They give me [itex]\frac{dx}{dt}[/itex] = 1.4. But I don't know how to use that to find [itex]\frac{dF}{dt}[/itex]. Any ideas?

Use the chain rule: dF/dt = dF/dx * dx/dt.
 
I tried that, but isn't the derivative of F just equal to 1? I really can't understand this problem. Its on the practice test for our upcoming final and I have never even seen anything like it before. But I really would like to understand it in case something like it shows up on our final though.

Cause I've used that form before for like price elasticity when [itex]\frac{dx}{dp}[/itex] * [itex]\frac{p}{x}[/itex]. But i don't understand how it would work here.

And by the way, this is a related rates problem right? And not an exponential growth model?
 
JacksonSolo said:
I tried that, but isn't the derivative of F just equal to 1?
No. Show me how you calculated dF/dx.
JacksonSolo said:
I really can't understand this problem. Its on the practice test for our upcoming final and I have never even seen anything like it before. But I really would like to understand it in case something like it shows up on our final though.

Cause I've used that form before for like price elasticity when [itex]\frac{dx}{dp}[/itex] * [itex]\frac{p}{x}[/itex]. But i don't understand how it would work here.

And by the way, this is a related rates problem right? And not an exponential growth model?
 
Yes, this is a related rates problem.

You are given the relationship between pollution level x and the number of fish F, and need to find the rate at which the fish population is changing, dF/dt.
 
Oh I see, [itex]\frac{df}{dx}[/itex] = [itex]\frac{-3x^{-3/2}}{2}[/itex]? So [itex]\frac{df}{dx}[/itex] * [itex]\frac{dx}{dt}[/itex] = [itex]\frac{-3x^{-3/2}}{2}[/itex] * 1.4?
 
JacksonSolo said:
Oh I see, [itex]\frac{df}{dx}[/itex] = [itex]\frac{-3x^{-3/2}}{2}[/itex]? So [itex]\frac{df}{dx}[/itex] * [itex]\frac{dx}{dt}[/itex] = [itex]\frac{-3x^{-3/2}}{2}[/itex] * 1.4?
Just how did you go from
F = 32000/(3 + √x)

to dF/dx = (-3/2)x-3/2?

Also, you are treating dx/dt as if it were a constant (1.4). It isn't. This is the rate of change of pollutant at a particular time, the time when there are 4,000 fish. You will also need to figure out what the value of x is at this same time.
 
I derived it. 32000 & 3 are constants so they cancel out and you are left with 1/[itex]\sqrt{x}[/itex] with is 1/x[itex]^{\frac{1}{2}}[/itex] which is just x[itex]^{\frac{-1}{2}}[/itex] Then you add one to the exponent and multiply it in front of x which gives you (-3/2)x[itex]^{-3/2}[/itex].

Oh ok, so I rewrite the original equation in terms of x in order to find out how many pollutants are in the lake when there are 4000 fish.

That gives me (3+[itex]\sqrt{x}[/itex])*(4000) = 32000. Which simplifies to x = 25 ([itex]\sqrt{x}[/itex] = 5) Is that right?
 
JacksonSolo said:
I derived it. 32000 & 3 are constants so they cancel out and you are left with 1/[itex]\sqrt{x}[/itex]
You're kidding, right?

What you said is so incorrect, it's hard to know what to tell you.

What differentiation rules have you heard of?

BTW, you don't "derive" a function - you differentiate it to get the derivative.
JacksonSolo said:
with is 1/x[itex]^{\frac{1}{2}}[/itex] which is just x[itex]^{\frac{-1}{2}}[/itex] Then you add one to the exponent and multiply it in front of x which gives you (-3/2)x[itex]^{-3/2}[/itex].

Oh ok, so I rewrite the original equation in terms of x in order to find out how many pollutants are in the lake when there are 4000 fish.

That gives me (3+[itex]\sqrt{x}[/itex])*(4000) = 32000. Which simplifies to x = 25 ([itex]\sqrt{x}[/itex] = 5) Is that right?
At least you're on the right track, but x = 25 and √x = 5 are both incorrect.

x does not represent the number of pollutants in the lake - presumably there is one pollutant. x represents the parts per million of that pollutant.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K