Rate of change of water in a trough

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the rate of change of the height of water in an inverted equilateral triangular trough, given the volume of water flowing in at a specific rate. The dimensions of the trough and the depth of the water are provided, but the relationship between the base and height of the triangle is also a key aspect of the discussion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the base and height of an equilateral triangle, with some suggesting the use of trigonometry or the Pythagorean theorem. There is confusion regarding the two heights involved: the height of the trough and the height of the water. Attempts to derive a formula for volume based on these dimensions are also explored.

Discussion Status

Several participants are actively engaging with the problem, attempting to clarify relationships and calculations. Some have offered guidance on how to approach the geometry of the triangle, while others are working through their calculations and seeking assistance with errors they have encountered. There is a recognition of the need to focus on the height of the water at a specific time, and some clarity is emerging regarding the correct dimensions to use.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of the specific height of the water (40 cm) in their calculations, while also grappling with the implications of the overall dimensions of the trough. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity introduced by having two heights in the problem, which may affect the approach to differentiation.

Emethyst
Messages
117
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The cross section of a trough for holding water is an inverted equilateral triangle. The trough is 6m long and 50cm deep. If the water is flowing in a t a rate of 0.6m^3/min, find the rate at which the height is changing when the water is 40cm deep.


Homework Equations


implicit differentation



The Attempt at a Solution


I started with the equation V=1/2(bh)l and the given information of dV/dt=0.6. From the equation and all information given, I can see that I am not given b as either a static number or as a rate, and thus need to somehow get rid of it by finding another relationship. My problem is I can't seem to find that relationship, as the only thing that seems to make sense to me is to use similar triangles to get a relationship, but I used this method I ended up with 3 variables instead of 2. Could anyone be of assistance and point me in the right direction for this question, as I have no idea where to find the correct equation for differentation to solve for the answer. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An equilateral triangle has a very definite relation between base and height. Can you find it? Use trigonometry! Or just the Pythagorean theorem!
 
Well I can't remember my earlier lessons on trig :-p so I used the Pythagorean Theorem and came up with B=(2/sqrt3)h, where B is the base and h is the height. This brings up another question as there seems to be 2 heights here, one that is the actual trough height and the other that is the height of the water at a specific time. Will there not be 2 separate heights invovled in the equation, or will one simply be ignored in the solving process?
 
The overall width of the tank is not 2/sqrt(3) cm. By my calculations it is roughly 60 cm wide. Yes, there are two heights in this problem, but you need to work with only the height of the water at a particular time (when h = 60 cm.).
 
60cm? How would I come up with such an answer? What I did was go B^2=((1/2)B)^2+h^2 and solved the expression for B. For me this made sense because the answer is 8/sqrt3. EDIT: After trying to solve it though I can now see it doesn't work, so that must be where I am going wrong, along with being unsure about the heights.
 
Mark44 said:
The overall width of the tank is not 2/sqrt(3) cm. By my calculations it is roughly 60 cm wide. Yes, there are two heights in this problem, but you need to work with only the height of the water at a particular time (when h = 60 cm.).

Emethyst said that the width of the cross section is 2*h/sqrt(3). I concur with that. And you want the width at h=40cm. What's your problem with that? And yes, you don't care about the 50cm number, you care about the 40cm number. Where did you come up with h=60cm?
 
Ok I think I see how to solve the question now. The only problem I seem to be having is getting the correct answer. What I did was:

V=(1/2)Bhw
V=(1/2)((2/sqrt3)h)hw
V=((1/sqrt3)h^2)(6)
V=(6/sqrt3)h^2
dV/dt=(6/sqrt3)(2h)(dh/dt)
0.6=(6/sqrt3)(2(0.4))(dh/dt)
0.6=(4.8/sqrt3)(dh/dt)
0.6/(4.8/sqrt3)=dh/dt
sqrt3/0.125=dh/dt

This is not the answer that the sheet says (the correct answer is sqrt3/8). I know that 4.8/0.6=8 though, so I know I must have gone wrong somewhere in my calculations. If any of you see the mistake please point it out.
 
Dick said:
Emethyst said that the width of the cross section is 2*h/sqrt(3). I concur with that. And you want the width at h=40cm. What's your problem with that? And yes, you don't care about the 50cm number, you care about the 40cm number. Where did you come up with h=60cm?
My mistake. In doing mental calculations, I was thinking I was getting half the width, but on reflection it was the full width, which is roughly 30 cm. And I missed her h.
 
Emethyst said:
Ok I think I see how to solve the question now. The only problem I seem to be having is getting the correct answer. What I did was:

V=(1/2)Bhw
V=(1/2)((2/sqrt3)h)hw
V=((1/sqrt3)h^2)(6)
V=(6/sqrt3)h^2
dV/dt=(6/sqrt3)(2h)(dh/dt)
0.6=(6/sqrt3)(2(0.4))(dh/dt)
0.6=(4.8/sqrt3)(dh/dt)
0.6/(4.8/sqrt3)=dh/dt
sqrt3/0.125=dh/dt

This is not the answer that the sheet says (the correct answer is sqrt3/8). I know that 4.8/0.6=8 though, so I know I must have gone wrong somewhere in my calculations. If any of you see the mistake please point it out.

0.6/(4.8/sqrt(3))=sqrt(3)*(0.6/4.8)=sqrt(3)*(1/8). You somehow flipped the 0.6/4.8 part upside down.
 
  • #10
Ahh I see my mistake now, thanks for the help Dick, what I did was invert 0.6/(4.8/sqrt3) to get 0.6*(sqrt3/4.8) in order to get rid of the fraction, I just forgot to separate the sqrt3 then multiply it by the 1/8 by the looks of it. Thanks for all of that help, it has been greatly appreciated.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K