Rate of entropy generation (can it be negative?)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of entropy generation (Sgen) in thermodynamics, specifically addressing whether the rate of entropy generation (\dot{S}_{gen}) can be negative. Participants assert that while Sgen itself cannot be negative, its rate can decrease during certain processes, akin to a car slowing down. The conversation emphasizes that thermodynamics focuses on overall changes between defined states rather than the rates of those changes. The Clausius inequality is highlighted, particularly in the context of closed, adiabatic systems, and the need for clarity in expressing entropy changes is noted.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Clausius inequality in thermodynamics
  • Familiarity with the concept of entropy and its implications in physical processes
  • Knowledge of closed and adiabatic systems in thermodynamic contexts
  • Basic principles of non-equilibrium thermodynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Clausius inequality and its applications in closed systems
  • Research non-equilibrium thermodynamics and its implications for entropy generation
  • Explore statistical thermodynamics to understand entropy in quantum mechanical contexts
  • Review "Transport Phenomena" by Bird, Steward, and Lightfoot for practical applications of entropy generation
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in thermodynamics, physicists, engineers, and anyone interested in the principles of entropy and its role in physical processes.

JJBladester
Gold Member
Messages
281
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



The Clausius inequality combined with the definition of entropy yields an inequality known as the increase of entropy principal, expressed as

Sgen ≥ 0

where Sgen is the entropy generated during a process.

Homework Equations



Sgen ≥ 0

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that Sgen cannot be negative, but can the rate of Sgen, \dot{S}_{gen} be negative?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I do believe. You mean the entropy generates fast at first and slow later. Why not.
 
dikmikkel said:
I do believe. You mean the entropy generates fast at first and slow later. Why not.

That was my thought but I wasn't sure as this whole entropy thing is rather new to me.

I reasoned that if a car going 50mph slows down to 40mph, it still has a positive velocity, but the velocity derivative (acceleration) is negative. Likewise, Sgen's time rate of change can be negative although entropy generated overall can only be positive. Test on Friday... I hope I'm right!
 
Thermodynamics (Equilibrium) neither entertains (asks) nor answers questions concerning the rates of processes. Rates of processes is irrelevant to find answers to questions in thermodynamics. Once the initial and final states of a system are defined, the process connecting them could be of any rate (could be infinitely fast/slow), the result of the entropy change will be the same.
It would perhaps be better to write the equation as delta S universe greater than or equal to zero instead of Sgen greater than or equal to zero, to reduce possible ambiguity and misinterpretations.
 
Radhakrishnam said:
Thermodynamics (Equilibrium) neither entertains (asks) nor answers questions concerning the rates of processes. Rates of processes is irrelevant to find answers to questions in thermodynamics. Once the initial and final states of a system are defined, the process connecting them could be of any rate (could be infinitely fast/slow), the result of the entropy change will be the same.
It would perhaps be better to write the equation as delta S universe greater than or equal to zero instead of Sgen greater than or equal to zero, to reduce possible ambiguity and misinterpretations.

I think what Radhakrishnam is alluding to here is that the constrained form of the Clausius inequality described by you in the OP applies to a closed, adiabatic system (i.e., an isolated system). The entire universe can be regarded as a closed, adiabatic system. The more general form of the Clausius inequality, applicable to closed (but not necessarily adiabatic) systems is dS > dq/T.
 
Radhakrishnam said:
Thermodynamics (Equilibrium) neither entertains (asks) nor answers questions concerning the rates of processes. Rates of processes is irrelevant to find answers to questions in thermodynamics.

That is true. Fair enough. But aside from that, I want to know what happens along the way, not just at the endpoints. If it's not under the umbrella of thermodynamics, in what area of science may my question be asked?

Chestermiller said:
I think what Radhakrishnam is alluding to here is that the constrained form of the Clausius inequality described by you in the OP applies to a closed, adiabatic system (i.e., an isolated system). The entire universe can be regarded as a closed, adiabatic system. The more general form of the Clausius inequality, applicable to closed (but not necessarily adiabatic) systems is dS > dq/T.

Entropy Generation Definition:
Entropy generated (Sgen) during a process is a measure of the irreversibilities of that process.

Lets say you have a device that is rougher in one area than another and when the parts move in the device, more friction occurs as the parts make contact with the rough area.

The rate of entropy generation would be positive through this rough patch because the device introduces more irreversibility (friction) here. Then as your parts go back to moving smoothly and they are not touching the rough area, the friction subsides and the rate of entropy generation would be negative.

Does this make sense? This would make it sound like the rate of entropy generation could be negative.
 
JJBladester said:
That is true. Fair enough. But aside from that, I want to know what happens along the way, not just at the endpoints. If it's not under the umbrella of thermodynamics, in what area of science may my question be asked?

Since we can choose the initial and final states as we please, it is possible to get the information at every point of the path (remember, it must be a reversible path). Along non-reversible paths the system will not be in a state of equilibrium and the properties of the system accordingly will be ill-defined.

Since your question concerns entropy, if and when you understand entropy well, you will find your question does not hold good - the question would disappear.



Entropy Generation Definition:
Entropy generated (Sgen) during a process is a measure of the irreversibilities of that process.

Lets say you have a device that is rougher in one area than another and when the parts move in the device, more friction occurs as the parts make contact with the rough area.

The rate of entropy generation would be positive through this rough patch because the device introduces more irreversibility (friction) here. Then as your parts go back to moving smoothly and they are not touching the rough area, the friction subsides and the rate of entropy generation would be negative.

Does this make sense? This would make it sound like the rate of entropy generation could be negative.

Thermodynamics gives whether a given process under given conditions is possible or impossible, in principle. when a process is known to be possible, the rate at which it is possible to carry out that process in practice depends upon the kinetics which takes into account the presence of catalysts, for example, etc. But that would not help in finding out the rate of generation of entropy.

Thermodynamics is much simpler to understand and appreciate than what it is projected to be in many books.
 
JJBladester said:
That is true. Fair enough. But aside from that, I want to know what happens along the way, not just at the endpoints. If it's not under the umbrella of thermodynamics, in what area of science may my question be asked?



Entropy Generation Definition:
Entropy generated (Sgen) during a process is a measure of the irreversibilities of that process.

Lets say you have a device that is rougher in one area than another and when the parts move in the device, more friction occurs as the parts make contact with the rough area.

The rate of entropy generation would be positive through this rough patch because the device introduces more irreversibility (friction) here. Then as your parts go back to moving smoothly and they are not touching the rough area, the friction subsides and the rate of entropy generation would be negative.

Does this make sense? This would make it sound like the rate of entropy generation could be negative.

Here are some suggestions on how to begin to get a handle on what you are looking for:

1. Bird, Steward, and Lightfoot "Transport Phenomena" has a homework problem that looks at entropy generation in non-equilibrium continua.

2. Look up non-equilibrium thermodynamics in Wikipedia

3. Get a book on Statistical Thermodynamics, and get an idea how entropy is expressed in terms of the total number of quantum mechanical states available. Then start looking at how the molecular dynamics guys use statistical thermo to quantify entropy (and other thermodynamic entities) in systems that are not at equilibrium.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K