Ratio of amplitudes in a damped oscillator

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the behavior of a damped harmonic oscillator, specifically the ratio of two successive maxima in displacement. Participants express confusion about why these maxima do not occur at the points where the displacement curve intersects the envelope curve Ae^(-yt). The importance of relevant equations and graphical representations is emphasized to clarify the relationship between displacement and damping. The conversation highlights the need to consider the slopes at the points of contact to understand the maxima's location better. Overall, the thread aims to resolve misconceptions about the characteristics of damped oscillations.
tiago23
Messages
4
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Show that the ratio of two successive maxima in the displacement of a damped harmonic oscillator is constant.(Note: The maxima do not occur at the points of contact of the displacement curve with the curve Aeˆ(-yt) where y is supposed to be gamma.

2. Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I was going through Fowles' Analytical Mechanics and found this exercise in the oscillations chapter. My problem isn't so much with doing the exercise as it is with the note of the authors in the end about the maxima not being in the points of contact between the two curves: Why not? Where else would the maxima of displacement be? I don't get that. Where is my mistake?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
tiago23 said:

Homework Statement


Show that the ratio of two successive maxima in the displacement of a damped harmonic oscillator is constant.(Note: The maxima do not occur at the points of contact of the displacement curve with the curve Aeˆ(-yt) where y is supposed to be gamma.

2. Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I was going through Fowles' Analytical Mechanics and found this exercise in the oscillations chapter. My problem isn't so much with doing the exercise as it is with the note of the authors in the end about the maxima not being in the points of contact between the two curves: Why not? Where else would the maxima of displacement be? I don't get that. Where is my mistake?
This is one of the reasons we have a "Relevant Equations" section in the Template. It would help us a lot if you posted the Relevant Equations for damped harmonic motion, showed some graphs (use Google Images with attribution if necessary), and described how your perception is different from the Relevant Equations and those graphs. Can you do that for us please? Thanks. :smile:
 
Have you got this now? Well you might well, remembering what these curves look like, think for a moment that the points of contact were at the maxima. But then as soon as somebody tells you they aren't you think a few seconds and say doh, oh yes, right! So I almost don't like to spell anything further out. What can you say about slopes at the points of contact between the two curves?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes berkeman

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K