Rationale behind using pirated software

  • Thread starter Thread starter amenhotep
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    software
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the ethical and legal implications of using pirated software, particularly in the context of a hypothetical scenario involving a poor African student who cannot afford necessary educational tools. Participants debate whether it is justifiable to use pirated software when legitimate options are financially inaccessible. Some argue that piracy is a form of theft, while others contend that it is a copyright infringement that does not equate to traditional theft, as it does not deprive the original owner of their property. The conversation also touches on the historical context of copyright laws, suggesting that wealthier nations often disregarded these laws during their own development, raising questions about the fairness of imposing strict copyright adherence on poorer countries today. Additionally, there is a discussion about the methods software companies use to detect piracy, highlighting the complexities of software licensing and the potential for open-source alternatives. Overall, the thread emphasizes the moral dilemmas surrounding software piracy, the economic realities faced by students in developing regions, and the broader implications of intellectual property laws.
  • #31
  • Like
Likes cpman
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Ryan_m_b said:
Legally it isn't theft, it's infringement of copyright. With regards to the extreme hypothetical of a poor African student I expect that most companies wouldn't mind giving that person a free copy anyway, obvious practical reason why his doesn't happen is confirming the person is who they say they are. In this case were I the student then I probably would pirate. But this is an extreme case. Any answers to this don't have anything to say about piracy in general.

I've spent many years on software license consulting with software engineering, corporate legal, and customers.

Sometimes piracy includes copyright violations, sometimes it doesn't, but it IS theft. Theft of product, theft of services, and fraud.

- Greg
 
  • Like
Likes Mark44, Danger and Evo
  • #33
leroyjenkens said:
I can't consider piracy on the same level as theft.
If I, for example, download a movie illegally, I'm not depriving anyone of their property
You're depriving the producers of the movie of their intellectual property, and by extension, the stockholders of the movie company, employees of the movie company, etc.
leroyjenkens said:
, like I would be if I broke into your house and stole items.
By this reasoning, it sounds like you're saying that if someone hacks your computer and gets your credit card information, they would not be depriving someone (you) of their property, simply because they didn't physically break into your house.
leroyjenkens said:
And I'm not necessarily depriving them of money I would have otherwise spent on paying for the movie, because I won't necessarily have paid for the movie if it wasn't available to be downloaded for free.
How it works is that if there are enough people who can rationalize this behavior, it eventually makes a big enough difference that producers of intellectual property decide that they can't make back their expenses, and they stop producing that intellectual property.
 
  • #34
Concentrating on the question that was actually asked:
You meet a friend who is using a pirated version of a software and he isn't even aware that what he's doing is illegal
6. What do you do ?
... I'd point out that the software he is using infringes copyright and exposes him to prosecution. However you or I feel about the software, if you are going to break the law it is best to know that you are doing it and be aware of the issues involved.

I would not use the word "pirated" to describe the software used ...
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html

I'd encourage the friend to use free/libre and open-source software instead of the proprietary alternatives currently used against the copyright-holder's wishes.
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/

I would not suggest any freeware, though, since software that goes by that label is more often than not proprietary software offered free of charge but does not respect the users freedom. But I would not have the same concerns provided the friend knows the terms of use and can make an informed choice about whether or not to abide by them.
 
  • #35
GregRobert said:
Theft of product, theft of services, and fraud.
So, regarding my previous question... in your professional opinion, was I guilty for buying a computer with commercial software already in it? If so, how could I have known that?
 
  • #36
I actually agree with WWGD in that the only way of having a reasonably-level playing field between those with
few resources and those with plenty is to ignore copyright _until_ one moves up in the professional ladder. After that, no more freebies. And it is absurd that countries with well-developed industries and technologies, often with 10's, if not 100's of years of experience expect (economically) smaller/weaker, less-developed countries to fully lower their trade and tariff barriers. Seriously? A start-up in, say, Haiti is supposed to compete in an equal footing with the likes of Krupps, or any of the other powerful, well-heeled companies with millions of dollars in their R&D budgets and 100's of hi-tech patents? Seems comparable to asking a 10-year old child to stop mooching and get a job. Let him grow up in a protected environment, nurture him/her, let them become stronger, maybe earn a trade or a degree and _then_ ask them to compete on the same footing with all the more knowledgeable ones. And, again, like WWGD said, many western countries did have their own trade barriers and tariffs in their beginning, until they were strong-enough. But now the want the poorer countries with weaker technology to lower their guards and lower their barriers/tariffs.

Why aren't more people who decry the theft of intellectual property bothered at the fact that most of the rich west helped build itself up by pirating and violating copyright ? I saw the actual C-Span show were the details of that book WWGD mentions where presented:

http://www.booktv.org/search.aspx?For=Bad%20Samaritans.
 
  • #37
DaveC426913 said:
Without taking sides in the issue, I'll correct an oft-used yet terrible analogy:

"You won't be talking about rationale if you distributed your food and TVs outside your home, and someone made copies of them, leaving your fridge and TV (and all the others) intact."

In short:

Software piracy is not theft. Software piracy is software piracy.
GregRobert said:
I've spent many years on software license consulting with software engineering, corporate legal, and customers.

Sometimes piracy includes copyright violations, sometimes it doesn't, but it IS theft. Theft of product, theft of services, and fraud.

- Greg
Simon Bridge said:
Concentrating on the question that was actually asked: ... I'd point out that the software he is using infringes copyright and exposes him to prosecution. However you or I feel about the software, if you are going to break the law it is best to know that you are doing it and be aware of the issues involved.

I would not use the word "pirated" to describe the software used ...
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html

I'd encourage the friend to use free/libre and open-source software instead of the proprietary alternatives currently used against the copyright-holder's wishes.
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/

I would not suggest any freeware, though, since software that goes by that label is more often than not proprietary software offered free of charge but does not respect the users freedom. But I would not have the same concerns provided the friend knows the terms of use and can make an informed choice about whether or not to abide by them.
Simon Bridge finally used the word, "infringe".
 
  • #38
StevieTNZ said:
There was admission by the member that they did indeed edit their post, so I don't know how the question can still stand.

Strictly speaking s/he stated that the message may have been edited by a mentor/staff, that s/he did not clearly remember whether this was the case or not
Vanadium 50 said:
I'll thank you not to put words in my mouth.

I don't see what is wrong here. Was your message distorted somehow by this edit? What part was edited-in, do you know; can you show it? I don't have access to these tools.
 
  • #39
Simon Bridge finally used the word, "infringe".
... look in the links and see why :)
Copyright infringement being piracy or theft is, afaik, not supported by case law.
But it is also not the topic introduced in post #1 and does not answer the question posed there.
 
  • #41
Closed for moderation
 
  • #42
Closed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K