1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Ray transfer martix of interface

  1. May 26, 2009 #1
    I found two different descriptions about ray transfer martix of interface in two textbook. I am confused about this. which one is correct? I hope someone can help me.
    _________________________________________________________________

    A:Lasers, A.E.Siegman,pp586
    B:Laser Resonators and Beam Propagation, N.Hodgson, pp16
     

    Attached Files:

    • A.E.jpg
      A.E.jpg
      File size:
      40.9 KB
      Views:
      50
    • LR.jpg
      LR.jpg
      File size:
      9.7 KB
      Views:
      43
  2. jcsd
  3. May 26, 2009 #2

    Andy Resnick

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    Siegman's is the one I am used to seeing- that is the refraction matrix written out using the paraxial approximation and the (y, nu) form for rays. I don't immediately see how to transform Siegman's into Hodgson's, but maybe Hodgson is using a different ray notation?
     
  4. May 27, 2009 #3
    I check these two descriptions again, and I found that the difference may be caused by the understanding about optical path.

    example:Plane Dielectric Slab
     

    Attached Files:

Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook