Rayleigh-scattering and dipole Common characters?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stylewriter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dipole
AI Thread Summary
Rayleigh scattering in X-rays involves the change in direction of X-rays without energy loss, primarily due to interactions with dipoles. This scattering occurs when the wavelength of the radiation is greater than the size of the dipole, allowing the dipole to oscillate in an electric field and scatter the X-rays in various directions. The strength of the scattered wave increases with frequency, explaining phenomena like the blue sky. The discussion emphasizes that Rayleigh scattering is a classical effect, and its principles do not apply when quantum effects become significant. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the relationship between Rayleigh scattering and dipoles.
Stylewriter
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hello!

This time I've got a question about the "Rayleigh-scattering" in X-Rays.
The Rayleigh-scattering says, that the x-ray changes it direction only without "loosing" energy.
Why does this happen and what has it to do with dipoles? My university professor told me, that the Rayleigh-scattering has something to do with dipoles.
I can't find anything in books about that. I hope you could help me, that I can understand this problem.
Thanks a lot!
 
Science news on Phys.org
There are several types of diffusion of em.radiation on matter particles,even in the classical theory of electromagnetism.

Rayleigh diffusion,treated thoroughly in Jackson's book,indeed assumes the variation of the wave vector only in direction,and not in modulus.

Daniel.
 
It is because Lord Rayleigh considered scattering on small dipoles. The power emmitted by dipole is proportional to the frequency^4, so the scattered wave becames stronger at highier frequencies (that is why the sky is blue)
 
I am not sure if I understand this... If we've got an atom like H and we firing x-ray at it, does it then oscillate (like a dipole) and scatters the x-ray into another direction? And in WHAT direction?
Am I totally wrong with that? ;)
 
First of all, the Rayleigh scattering takes places when wavelength is greater then the dipole size. So not any X-ray scattering on atoms can be considered in that approximation.

Second, if a wavelength of the X-ray radiation is bigger then the dipole size, we can assume that the dipole is under an oscillating electric field, thus it oscillates itself. The combination of original wave and the wave due to dipole radiation produces the scattering, because the dipole does not radiate flat wave. So instead of original flat wave we have waves propagating in different directions.

Third, I did not say anything about quantum. That was done deliberately, because it the the nature of the Rayleigh approximation, it is a classical effect. The mechanism will be no longer valid if quantum effects are important.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top