Rayleigh Scattering calculation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of Rayleigh scattering to explain why the sky appears blue. The key formula referenced is I = 1/lambda^4, which describes the intensity of scattered light as a function of wavelength. The conversation highlights that the scattering angle and the size of atmospheric particles also play critical roles in this phenomenon. The explanation provided clarifies that the light reaching the observer's eye is predominantly blue due to the higher probability of shorter wavelengths scattering, while longer wavelengths like red penetrate the atmosphere more deeply, contributing to the color of sunsets.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Rayleigh scattering principles
  • Familiarity with the formula I = 1/lambda^4
  • Knowledge of scattering angles and their impact on light perception
  • Basic concepts of light wavelength and atmospheric composition
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of the Rayleigh scattering equation from physics literature
  • Explore the impact of atmospheric particles on light scattering
  • Learn about the differences in light scattering for various wavelengths
  • Investigate the phenomenon of color changes during sunrise and sunset
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, atmospheric scientists, educators, and anyone interested in the optical properties of the atmosphere and the science behind the colors of the sky.

nmsurobert
Messages
288
Reaction score
36
I've been trying to find a proof or a paper that goes into calculating why the sky is blue as opposed to the "the sky is blue because of scattering" explanation that all over the internet. I (think) understand the concept but I would like to see some numbers. I'm aware of the I = 1/lambda^4 formula. But I can't use that to explain the color of the sky. Is that a water down version of what is used to explain the color of the sky? I would think we have to take the incident wavelength into account as well as the size of the particle that causing the scattering.

Can anyone link me to something like this?

Thanks!
 
Science news on Phys.org
If you are aware of the formulas,
(for example see Wikipedia https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rayleigh_scattering)
then I don’t think calculating is the issue. In particular equation six in the Wikipedia article shows the scattered intensity as a function of wavelength and angle and includes linked references if you’d like to see the derivation. That equation is not watered down, and it shows why the sky is blue.

Perhaps you would like some explanation as to what it means. When you look at the sky you are not looking at the sun. Light from the sun cannot go directly into your eye. Instead what you are seeing is sun light that was NOT traveling toward you. The light traveled directly from the sun to a point on a line along your line of sight. At that point it scattered from the atmosphere toward your eye. The line from the sun to the scatter point and the line from the scatter point to your eye make an angle. That is the scattering angle. Paths with multiple scatters are also happening, but the single scatter is much more probable. What the formula is telling you is that the probability of scattering (and therefore the scattered intensity) is much greater for shorter wavelengths (and smaller angles by the way) so the spectrum that reaches your eye is not white like sunlight, but weighted toward blue. For the very same reason reds are less likely to scatter and penetrate the atmosphere further making the light on the direct path a little yellow, or orange, or red depending on how much atmosphere it has to get through. That is why sunsets are red.

Bottom line, it is all right there in the scattering function.
 
  • Like
Likes anorlunda and nmsurobert
Awesome. I was looking for a derivation for the equation but if that's what it is then that's what it is. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K