Re-evolution of wavefunction after collapse

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter 01030312
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collapse Wavefunction
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
01030312
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
How much time does it take for wavefunction to start re-evolution after its observation is over? Or how does it evolve?
I think, considering feynman path formulation, it should start evolving instantaneously, with wavefunction ending at edge of light cone (light cone that has its tip at the point of collapse). Its like wavefunction fills this light cone.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
01030312 said:
How much time does it take for wavefunction to start re-evolution after its observation is over? Or how does it evolve?
I think, considering feynman path formulation, it should start evolving instantaneously, with wavefunction ending at edge of light cone (light cone that has its tip at the point of collapse). Its like wavefunction fills this light cone.

The collapse of a wavefunction means its annihilation. It's not 'resurrected' after an observation; what evolves is the wavefunction of a different system.
 
Consider a position wave-function. After observation, i think, it does not annihilate, but changes to a dirac-delta function. Once observation has been removed, the unitary evolution takes place again. The phenomena of reduction itself was a part of evolution, though non-unitary.