Reading a Force vs Time graph to get distance?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the distance traveled by a 3.5-kg block over 11 seconds using a Force vs Time graph. The user correctly identifies the need to apply Newton's second law (F=ma) to find acceleration, resulting in 1.14 m/s². However, they struggle with determining the final velocity for distance calculations using the equation Vf² = Vi² + 2ad. The conversation emphasizes the importance of updating initial velocity after each segment of time to accurately compute total distance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's second law (F=ma)
  • Familiarity with kinematic equations, specifically Vf² = Vi² + 2ad
  • Ability to interpret Force vs Time graphs
  • Knowledge of basic calculus concepts for motion analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of kinematic equations in one-dimensional motion
  • Learn how to analyze Force vs Time graphs for acceleration and velocity
  • Explore the concept of updating initial conditions in sequential calculations
  • Practice problems involving multiple segments of motion with varying forces
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and motion analysis, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to Force vs Time graphs and kinematic equations.

ceziacrowe
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The net force exerted on a 3.5-kg block is shown in the figure as a function of time. How far does the block travel in the first 11.0 s? Assume that the motion is one dimensional and that the velocity of the block at time t= 0 s is 0 m/s.

Homework Equations


Vf^2 = Vi^2 + 2ad
F=ma


The Attempt at a Solution


I figured that I could use the force on the graph so I used F=ma. Using the first point of the graph, I got 4 N = (3.5 kg)a, solved for a and got 1.14 m/s^2. Since I'm trying to find distance, I tried using Vf^2 = Vi^2 + 2ad but here's where I got stuck. Initial velocity would be 0 m/s but for final velocity, I'm not sure where I would get that number from. Am I headed in the right direction with this problem?

Also, this type of graph is kind of confusing to read for me. If the y-axis in this problem was labeled acceleration (ax) instead of F(N), a straight horizontal line from 0 to 2 seconds would be constant acceleration then from 2 to 6 seconds, it would be zero acceleration?

Any help would be amazing and immensely appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • prob01av10.gif
    prob01av10.gif
    10.8 KB · Views: 1,092
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Use this equation: x = (1/2)*a*t^2 +Vi*t + Xi

And, a horizontal line is constant acceleration, A line horizontal at Zero is zero acceleration.
 
Texag said:
Use this equation: x = (1/2)*a*t^2 +Vi*t + Xi

And, a horizontal line is constant acceleration, A line horizontal at Zero is zero acceleration.

So I calculated each part and it's still coming out as an incorrect answer.

For 0-2 s, x=(1/2)(1.14 m/s^2)(2^2 s) + 0 m/s + 0.
I did the same thing (finding a then plugging it into that equation) until the 11.0 s mark on the graph but the answer was incorrect.

I also put for Xi the total amount of X calculated so far but I got the same answer of 10.838 m.
 
Last edited:
You have to be sure to change the initial velocity each time you calculate. For example, when finding the displacement of the second portion, It is not zero, but the final velocity of the one you calculated above.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
498
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K