Reading a Force vs Time graph to get distance?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves analyzing a force vs. time graph to determine the distance traveled by a block over a specified time interval. The context is rooted in classical mechanics, specifically focusing on the relationship between force, mass, acceleration, and displacement.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply Newton's second law (F=ma) to find acceleration and subsequently uses kinematic equations to calculate distance. However, they express uncertainty about determining the final velocity needed for their calculations. Some participants clarify the interpretation of the graph, noting that a horizontal line indicates constant acceleration, while a line at zero indicates no acceleration.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on the application of equations and the importance of updating initial velocity for each segment of the motion. There is recognition of confusion regarding the graph's interpretation, and participants are exploring different aspects of the problem without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes difficulty in reading the force vs. time graph and is working under the assumption that the initial velocity is zero. There are indications of potential miscalculations in the displacement due to not adjusting the initial velocity after each segment.

ceziacrowe
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The net force exerted on a 3.5-kg block is shown in the figure as a function of time. How far does the block travel in the first 11.0 s? Assume that the motion is one dimensional and that the velocity of the block at time t= 0 s is 0 m/s.

Homework Equations


Vf^2 = Vi^2 + 2ad
F=ma


The Attempt at a Solution


I figured that I could use the force on the graph so I used F=ma. Using the first point of the graph, I got 4 N = (3.5 kg)a, solved for a and got 1.14 m/s^2. Since I'm trying to find distance, I tried using Vf^2 = Vi^2 + 2ad but here's where I got stuck. Initial velocity would be 0 m/s but for final velocity, I'm not sure where I would get that number from. Am I headed in the right direction with this problem?

Also, this type of graph is kind of confusing to read for me. If the y-axis in this problem was labeled acceleration (ax) instead of F(N), a straight horizontal line from 0 to 2 seconds would be constant acceleration then from 2 to 6 seconds, it would be zero acceleration?

Any help would be amazing and immensely appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • prob01av10.gif
    prob01av10.gif
    10.8 KB · Views: 1,101
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Use this equation: x = (1/2)*a*t^2 +Vi*t + Xi

And, a horizontal line is constant acceleration, A line horizontal at Zero is zero acceleration.
 
Texag said:
Use this equation: x = (1/2)*a*t^2 +Vi*t + Xi

And, a horizontal line is constant acceleration, A line horizontal at Zero is zero acceleration.

So I calculated each part and it's still coming out as an incorrect answer.

For 0-2 s, x=(1/2)(1.14 m/s^2)(2^2 s) + 0 m/s + 0.
I did the same thing (finding a then plugging it into that equation) until the 11.0 s mark on the graph but the answer was incorrect.

I also put for Xi the total amount of X calculated so far but I got the same answer of 10.838 m.
 
Last edited:
You have to be sure to change the initial velocity each time you calculate. For example, when finding the displacement of the second portion, It is not zero, but the final velocity of the one you calculated above.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K