Real Analysis: Continuity & Intervals

Click For Summary
A continuous function defined on an interval has an image that is also an interval. The proof involves two cases: for a closed interval, the image is bounded by the supremum and infimum values, ensuring all intermediate values are achieved via the intermediate value theorem. For an open interval, the function can be expressed as a union of closed sets, allowing the application of the same principles to establish that the image remains an interval. The discussion also raises questions about half-open intervals, suggesting that similar reasoning can be applied to show the image is still an interval. Overall, the continuity of the function guarantees that the image covers all values between the extremes.
lmn123
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If the domain of a continuous function is an interval, show that the image is an interval.



Homework Equations


Theorem from book: f is a cont. function with compact domain D, then f is bounded and there exists points y and z such that f(y) = sup{ f(x) | x ∈ D} and f(z) = inf{ f(x) | x ∈ D}
The intermediate value theorem.


The Attempt at a Solution



Case 1: D=[a,b]
Since D is compact and by hypothesis, f is continuous we know that there exist points y and z in D such that f(y) = sup{ f(x) | x ∈ D} and f(z) = inf{ f(x) | x ∈ D}. By definition of sup and inf these are the greatest and least points of the image of f. And so, by the intermediate value theorem, we know that any t in between f(z) < t < f(y), there exists an x in D such that f(x)=t. So, we can write the interval of the image as [f(z),f(y)].

Case 2: D=(a,b)
We can write (a,b) as an infinite union of closed sets. For example ∪[a+1/m, b-1/m] from m=1 to infinity.
By the previous case we know that each [a+1/m, b-1/m] attains a sup and inf value for all 1/m. Now we can simply take the max( sup{ f(x) | x ∈ [a+1, b-1]}, sup{ f(x) | x ∈ [a+(1/2), b-(1/2)]}, sup{ f(x) | x ∈ [a+(1/3), b-(1/3)}, ... ) and call it p. Similarly we can take the min( inf{ f(x) | x ∈ [a+1, b-1]}, inf{ f(x) | x ∈ [a+(1/2), b-(1/2)]}, inf{ f(x) | x ∈ [a+(1/3), b-(1/3)}, ... ) and call it q. This will give us an open interval in which all values of the image lie. And so, the interval of the image of f is (q,p).

Is this the right way to prove this? It seems right to me but I also have my doubts haha. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What about half open intervals?
 
Kreizhn said:
What about half open intervals?

Suppose for a second that I did not need to worry about half open intervals is my above proof right then?

Now suppose I do need it in a more general case. What about this.

Given any interval besides the trivial case [x,x], there exits two points, y and z, within the interval such that y < z

So, using these two points we know that there are infinitely many p's within y < p < z. By the definition of continuity we can find points, all in the image of the function such that f(y)=a and f(z)=b, using the intermediate value theorem we know that for any k in between a and b we can find points within y and z such that f(p)=k for all k in a<k<b and for some p in the domain. Thus the image of f is an interval.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K