Real analysis:limit superior problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter K29
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves analyzing the sequence defined by \( c_{n} = \sqrt[n]{c} - 1 \) for \( c > 1 \) and demonstrating properties related to its limit superior. The context is situated within a section on power series, with subsequent questions following this one.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of the limit superior being less than or equal to zero and question how to apply Bernoulli's inequality effectively. There is also a consideration of rearranging the expression for \( c_{n} \) to facilitate the use of the inequality.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the goal of proving that the limit superior equals zero, while others have suggested applying Bernoulli's inequality to the expression for \( c_{n} \). The discussion appears to be moving towards a clearer understanding of the problem's requirements.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the relationship between limit superior and the limit itself, as well as the implications of the inequality provided in the problem statement.

K29
Messages
103
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let c>1 and let c_{n}=\sqrt[n]{c}-1
Show that c_{n} \geq 0 and that
\stackrel{limsup}{_{n \rightarrow \infty}}c_{n} \leq 0 by using Bernoullis inequality

(This problem actually occurs in a section on power series and there are more questions that follow from this one)

Homework Equations


(1+x)^{n} \geq 1+nx \forall x\geq -1



The Attempt at a Solution


I could do the first part, but I'm really at a loss for the second part, even with the bernoullis inequality hint.
I mean I have a fairly good understanding of limit superior so I don't even see how the result they get is even possible. In my head the limsup here is the same as the limit, and that should be greater than 0 anyway.

Either way, can you see a way to write \sqrt[n]{c}-1 so that I can use bernoullis inequality? All I can think of is pulling out -1, and that doesn't achieve much.

Any help on any of the above issues would be appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi K29! :smile:

The thing you write down, i.e. c_n\geq 0 and \limsup{c_n}\leq 0 is of course only possible if the limsup equals zero! So what the question actually asks you to prove is that \limsup{c_n}=0.

Now, what if you apply Bernouilli's inequality to x=\sqrt[n]{c}-1?
 
You know that c_{n}=c^{\frac{1}{n}}-1 The a little re-arrangement shows that c=(1+c_{n})^{n}, this is now in a good position to use Bernoullie inequality.
 
Thanks Micromass for helping me understand what my goal was. (It did seem rather impossible for the limsup to be <0 and that threw me off.)
And thanks hunt_mat, that bernoulli idea helped me solve the problem and get the limsup(c_n)=0
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K