Real Analysis: Proving f is a Constant Function

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves proving that a function \( f \) defined on the real line is constant, given the condition \( |f(x)-f(y)| \leq |x-y|^2 \) for all \( x, y \) in \( \mathbb{R} \.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss proof by contradiction and the implications of the given inequality. Some consider the use of derivatives, while others question the assumptions of continuity and differentiability. Suggestions include splitting intervals and examining limits to explore continuity.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with various approaches being explored. Some participants express confidence in certain methods, while others acknowledge potential errors and seek clarification on the validity of their reasoning.

Contextual Notes

There is a lack of explicit assumptions regarding the continuity or differentiability of the function \( f \), which is a point of contention in the discussion.

mglaros
Messages
10
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Let f be any function on the real line and suppose that: |f(x)-f(y)|<=|x-y|^2 for all x,y in R. Prove that f is a constant function. Note: "<=" reads "less than or equal to"

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I have tried proof by contradiction, it seems to be the most obvious route in proving this statement. I started by assuming that there exists x,y in the domain of the function f(x) such that f(x) is not equal to f(y). I wasn't really able to proceed much further from there. Any help towards finishing this proof or perhaps a different approach would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
can you use derivatves?

what is the magnitude of the derivative as x->y?
 
lanedance said:
can you use derivatves?
what is the magnitude of the derivative as x->y?
It's not given that the function is even continuous, let alone differentiable, so we can't assume that f' exists.
 
Mark44 said:
It's not given that the function is even continuous, let alone differentiable, so we can't assume that f' exists.

You could try and prove f' exists. Or you could try and split the interval between x and y into 2^n parts and see what the inequality tells you as n->infinity.
 
fair bump, I thought uniform continuity & differentiablilty would follow reasonably easy from the definition, though i do like Dick's 2nd suggestion
 
Last edited:
Spliting the interval into n equal parts should suffice.
 
How's this?

Let 0&lt;|x-a|&lt;\mathrm{min}(1,\varepsilon). From this, we have that 0\leq|f(x)-f(a)|\leq|x-a|^2&lt;|x-a|&lt;\varepsilon. This proves that f is continuous.

From the defining property of f, we know that,

\frac{|f(x)-f(a)|}{|x-a|} \leq |x-a|

Since f is continuous, evaluating the limit as x \to a, we find that f&#039;(a) = 0 which proves that f is a constant function.

I realize this is really rough, but could this approach be used to prove the initial problem? It's real late nowso I'm sure that it's riddled with errors.
 
Well yes for this you can show by definition that |f'(a)| = 0 for every a due to mean value theorem. You can run into troubles if you tried applying this to say, finding isometries on R. Obviously you only need to show differentiability, but anytime you see |f(x)-f(y)| bounded by something involving |x-y|, it's going to be continuous.
 
I think your proof is fine. I remember doing this problem last year and I think that's basically the solution I used; there may have been some subtlety I overlooked, but I don' think so.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K