(Real Analysis) Show the function is Bijection

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
14 replies · 4K views
phillyolly
Messages
157
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The problem and my attempt are attached.

I am unable to solve the function for x.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • pic.jpg
    pic.jpg
    6.8 KB · Views: 445
  • IMG_0142.jpg
    IMG_0142.jpg
    25.3 KB · Views: 473
Physics news on Phys.org
hmm, if you want to show injection, you need to show for all the values in the domain, now you only showing [tex]-1\neq1[/tex] how about [tex]-1\neq-1.1[/tex]?

so if you want to show an injection first see the definition of injection

whenever [tex]x\neq y \Rightarrow f(x) \neq f(y)[/tex]

or the contrapositive [tex]f(x)=f(y) \Rightarrow x=y[/tex]

normally i use the second one, so, for any for any x,y in R [tex]f(x)=f(y)\Rightarrow... \Rightarrow x=y[/tex]

that will complete the injection
 
Last edited:
hmm i just learn the latex, i don't know if there's a bug or its just me who did it wrong, I'm sorry, if i convey the different thing, try to refresh it ;P and sorry for my english
 
I don't understand what you're trying to do in 1). You say "Injection proof -1 [itex]\neq[/itex]1, and then go on to set f(-1) equal to f(1). ?

The idea here is the if f(a) = f(b), and f is one-to-one (i.e., f is an injection), then a = b.

The function is one-to-one.

To solve for x in the equation y = x/sqrt(x^2 + 1), square both sides of the equation, then move all terms in x to one side, and then factor.

It's a little tricky, because squaring both sides introduces extraneous solutions, so the equation for x does not seem to be a function. You will need to simplify the equation somewhat to make x a one-to-one function of y.
 
The definition for a bijection I usually use is:

Given [tex]f: A \rightarrow B,[/tex] f is a bijection if and only if

EDIT (thanks annoymage): [tex]\forall y \in B , \exists !x \in A \ni f(x) = y.[/tex]

"For all y in B, there exists a unique x in A such that f(x) = y."
 
Last edited:
Raskolnikov said:
The definition for a bijection I usually use is:

Given [tex]f: A \rightarrow B,[/tex] f is a bijection if and only if

[tex]\forall x \in A , \exists !y \in B \ni f(x) = y.[/tex]

"For all x in A, there exists a unique y in B such that f(x) = y."

hey, aren't that the definition of a function?
 
annoymage said:
hey, aren't that the definition of a function?

Yep, I have it backwards. Sorry, I'm a bit sleepy. It should be:

[tex] \forall y \in B , \exists !x \in A \ni f(x) = y. [/tex]
 
Raskolnikov said:
Yep, I have it backwards. Sorry, I'm a bit sleepy. It should be:

[tex] \forall y \in B , \exists !x \in A \ni f(x) = y. [/tex]

but that's the definition of a surjection
 
nope, the unique x part makes it a bijection. It's subtle but it's there! A surjection only guarantees there exists an x in A. A bijection tells us it's a unique x.
 
The process is still of course the same:
Solve for x in terms of y and show that's it's a unique solution.
 
Based on your feedback. This is my bijection thing.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0144.jpg
    IMG_0144.jpg
    20.1 KB · Views: 443
I would rather you do as Mark44 suggested and solve for x in terms of y.
 
phillyolly said:
Based on your feedback. This is my bijection thing.

this complete the injection, and now as mark44 suggested to do for the surjection