Real formula for gamma(deformation) in torsion of a rod?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the formula for gamma (γ) in the context of torsion of a rod, specifically the equation γ = ρφ / L. Participants clarify that for small angles, the sine function can be approximated as sin(γ) ≈ γ, which simplifies the understanding of deformation. The confusion arises from the geometric interpretation of the arc length (ρφ) in relation to the angle γ. The consensus is that the small angle approximation is valid when the length L is significantly greater than the radius ρ.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Mechanics of Materials principles
  • Familiarity with torsion and deformation concepts
  • Knowledge of small angle approximations in trigonometry
  • Basic geometric interpretation of angles and arc lengths
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the small angle approximation in trigonometry
  • Explore the mechanics of torsion in rods and beams
  • Review geometric interpretations of deformation in materials
  • Learn about the relationship between angle and arc length in circular motion
USEFUL FOR

Students studying Mechanics of Materials, engineers dealing with torsion analysis, and anyone seeking to understand the geometric implications of deformation in materials.

KalShaen
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Okay, so I'm studying for a Mechanics of Materials final at the moment, and I am reviewing the chapter on torsion.
I was reading through the given formulae, and I stumbled across one that I could not fully visualize (or simplify): the formula for gamma.

Based on my understanding and from what I know from before, shouldn't the formula:

\gamma=\rho\phi / L (for the deformation of a rod under torsion)

actualy be sin(\gamma) = \rho\phi/L ?

Correct me if I am wrong, but aren't we considering rho*phi to be the arc length of the end deformation, and considering that arc length to be the opposite side of the angle gamma in the pseudo-right triangle formed when the rod deforms?

I have come with two possible reasons for my confusion
1) The book is not using the sine function because the angle is very very small.
2) I am failing to realize what kind of geometric scenario is occurring between the angle gamma and the arc length rho*phi.

Please get back to me with a response as soon as possible so I can move on from being miserably confused! :P
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The answer is in your first possible reason. This is a small angle approximation, and actually, it is a very good approximation, provided the length L is several times rho.
 
Yes, nice observation, but as OldEngr63 pointed out, this is for small rotations. So sin(gamma) would approximately be gamma.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K