Reciprocal lattice and Fourier series

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of Fourier series in the context of electron number density as described in Charles Kittel's solid state physics book. The equation presented, n(x) = n_0 + ∑[C_p cos(2πpx/a) + S_p sin(2πpx/a)], raises questions about the behavior of C_p coefficients at x = 0. It is established that C_p values can be both non-zero and zero, and the validity of the Fourier series representation hinges on the function being finite and satisfying Dirichlet's conditions. Therefore, the assumption that n(x) can be infinite at x = 0 is incorrect.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier series and their properties
  • Familiarity with solid state physics concepts
  • Knowledge of Dirichlet's conditions for Fourier series
  • Basic mathematical skills in trigonometric functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Fourier series in detail
  • Review Dirichlet's conditions and their implications
  • Explore applications of Fourier series in solid state physics
  • Investigate the implications of electron number density in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on solid state physics, as well as mathematicians interested in Fourier analysis and its applications in physical systems.

touqra
Messages
284
Reaction score
0
First off, this is not a homework problem. I was reading Charles Kittel solid states book on Chapter 2, equation 3:

electron number density, n(x), expanded in a Fourier series:

[tex]n(x) = n_0 + \sum_{p} [C_p cos(\frac{2\pi p x}{a}) + S_p sin(\frac{2\pi p x}{a})][/tex]

From this expansion, wouldn't the density n(x = 0) be infinity ? since [tex]C_p[/tex] shouldn't be zero for the Fourier expansion to make sense.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Why shouldn't C_p be zero for it to make sense? You realize that the value of C_p depends on p, right? So there could be C_p values which are non-zero and others which are zero.
 
Basically Fourier series repersentation is applied to functions which are bounded.The next thing is that you have to check for appropriate Dirichlet's conditions.

Thus at the very beginning, a peassumption for applying Fourier series expansion is that the function it represents is always finite.
More simply speaking, kanato is right.
O.K.?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K