Reciprocal Lattice: Visible Points in an X-Ray Experiment

Click For Summary
In an X-ray experiment, only specific reciprocal lattice points corresponding to the orientation of the incident beam will appear in the diffraction pattern, as only parallel planes contribute to the diffraction. To reveal different reciprocal points, the orientation of the incident beam must be adjusted to involve another set of parallel planes. It is possible to align a single crystal to fulfill the Bragg condition for multiple sets of lattice planes simultaneously, allowing for multiple reflections. This phenomenon is known as the Renninger effect or multiple beam diffraction, first described in 1935. Understanding this concept is crucial for interpreting X-ray diffraction patterns accurately.
Dr_Pill
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
I got a bunch of questions about reciprocal lattice, I start with this one:

In an x-ray experiment:

For one specific orientation of your incident beam on your real lattice, only a portion of the points of your reciprocal lattice will become visible as your diffraction pattern right?

See my picture

nm4bBeB.jpg


For one incident beam, only the parallel planes are involved in your diffraction and so only the reciprocal lattice points that represent these set of parallel planes will becoem visible on your diffraction pattern

If you want to make other reciprocal points points visible on your diffraction pattern, u have to change the orientation of your incident beam so that another set of parallel planes is involved in diffraction
So in first picture, your blue beam will get the reciprocal points that representing the green parallel planes visible on your diffraction pattern.

Second picture, the same blue beam does nothing on the purple planes, so the reciprocal points that represents the purple planes will not be visible on the diffraction pattern.

Is this correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It might help with the Forum formatting if you reduce the size of your image to no more than 800 pixels by 600 pixels. There's no reason for it to be THIS big.

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
It might help with the Forum formatting if you reduce the size of your image to no more than 800 pixels by 600 pixels. There's no reason for it to be THIS big.

Zz.

Ok, like this? But now my picture is unsharp.
 
Last edited:
Dr_Pill said:
how can i resize it?

Remove the image, and upload a new, resized version.

Zz.
 
Dr. Pill,

your images are in real space, not reciprocal space.

It is perfectly possible to align a single crystal such that two or even three sets of lattice planes fulfull the Bragg condition simultaneously.

For the two-beam case this can be done by aligning one Bragg peak (corresponding to the reciprocal space vector Q), and by then rotating the crystal about the vector Q until you excite a second reflection (=changing the azimuthal angle). To get 3 simultaneous reflections you also need to tune the photon energy just right.

The effect is known by several names including "Umweganregung", "Renninger effect" and "Multiple beam diffracton". It was first described in 1935.

The following links give a bit more informaiton:

P. P. Ewald, Rev. Mod. Phys. v37, pp46 (1965)
http://rmp.aps.org/abstract/RMP/v37/i1/p46_1
This is an excellent review article about the early theory of x-ray diffraction, written by one of the founding fathers. Highly recommended if you are interested in x-rays.

Renninger, Z. Phys v. 106 pp 141 (1937) in German
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01340315

Description of a computer code for calculating Umwegs.
http://www1.uni-hamburg.de/mpi/rossmanith/Reprints/Z_Krist_85.pdf
 
Thread 'Unexpected irregular reflection signal from a high-finesse cavity'
I am observing an irregular, aperiodic noise pattern in the reflection signal of a high-finesse optical cavity (finesse ≈ 20,000). The cavity is normally operated using a standard Pound–Drever–Hall (PDH) locking configuration, where an EOM provides phase modulation. The signals shown in the attached figures were recorded with the modulation turned off. Under these conditions, when scanning the laser frequency across a cavity resonance, I expected to observe a simple reflection dip. Instead...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K