Recoil when ball is accelerated but not released

  • Thread starter Thread starter katieoneill
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball
katieoneill
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Will a skateboarder (initially at rest) experience recoil if he accelerates a ball as if about to throw but does not release the ball?


Homework Equations


pinitial=pfinal when not external forces


The Attempt at a Solution


I am confused with how to apply the momentum vectors for the throwing arm/ball and the body of the skateboarder.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
katieoneill said:

Homework Statement


Will a skateboarder (initially at rest) experience recoil if he accelerates a ball as if about to throw but does not release the ball?


Homework Equations


pinitial=pfinal when not external forces


The Attempt at a Solution


I am confused with how to apply the momentum vectors for the throwing arm/ball and the body of the skateboarder.

When you throw a ball, you apply a forward force to it. Newtons 3rd law say an equal sized force will act back on you - accelerating you.
If you don't release the ball, you must apply a backward force to stop that ball again. That means a forward force on you.

The ball first accelerates forwards, then accelerates backwards - but has a net movement forward.

You will first accelerate backwards, then accelerate Forwards - but have a net movement back.

The centre of mass of you and the ball will remain in the same place throughout.
 
Okay, that makes sense. Thanks so much. Just for clarification, I should take this to mean that for any case where a part of a system accelerates but is not released (ie if somehow rocket exhaust gases were released into a compartment of the rocket itself and not into space), there will be no recoil/equal and opposite momentum (ie the rocket will not move)? Basically, for some momentum to cause an equal and opposite reactant momentum, the 2 masses having momentum must separate?
 
katieoneill said:
Okay, that makes sense. Thanks so much. Just for clarification, I should take this to mean that for any case where a part of a system accelerates but is not released (ie if somehow rocket exhaust gases were released into a compartment of the rocket itself and not into space), there will be no recoil/equal and opposite momentum (ie the rocket will not move)? Basically, for some momentum to cause an equal and opposite reactant momentum, the 2 masses having momentum must separate?

That is correct, they must separate to get continuing motion.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K