Recommend a good E&M undergrad book that isn't Griffiths

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on recommendations for undergraduate textbooks on electromagnetism (E&M) that are alternatives to Griffiths. Participants express preferences for books that provide thorough derivations, conceptual explanations, and adequate preparation for the GRE.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant criticizes Griffiths for hiding important theorems and results in problems rather than including them in the main text, seeking a book that offers better conceptual descriptions and derivations.
  • Another participant recommends Purcell for its conceptual understanding, though it may not cover all topics in Griffiths.
  • Schwartz's "Classical Electrodynamics" is suggested for its intuitive and physical insights, despite being more advanced and not comprehensive like Griffiths.
  • Dugdale's "Essentials of Electromagnetism" is mentioned for starting with Maxwell's equations and discussing approximations in electrostatics and circuit theory.
  • Franklin's "Classical Electromagnetism" is noted for providing a good mathematical background, although it is a graduate-level text.
  • Reitz's "Foundations of Electromagnetic Theory" is shared as a favorable older alternative that covers similar topics to Griffiths.
  • Wangsness is recommended as a better option than Griffiths, with some participants noting it depends on the chapter, and Shadowitz is also mentioned as a good text.
  • A participant suggests working through PGRE exams to identify weaknesses in E&M before selecting a textbook.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views on the best alternatives to Griffiths, with no consensus on a single recommended text. Various suggestions highlight different strengths and focuses of the books mentioned.

Contextual Notes

Some recommendations emphasize conceptual understanding while others focus on mathematical rigor. There is a recognition that certain texts may not cover the full range of topics found in Griffiths, and participants suggest considering individual needs for GRE preparation.

TomServo
Messages
281
Reaction score
9
Don't care for Griffiths, and I think it would make a lousy reference given how many important theorems, results, etc. are hidden in the problems rather than included normally. I'd like a book that ideally has derivations of all the relevant formula and CONCEPTUAL descriptions of phenomena, covering the same material Griffiths covers. Just better. I want it to prepare for the GRE and for personal betterment. Suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It may not cover everything in Griffiths but for conceptual understanding I recommend Purcell.
 
For conceptual understanding and a beautiful exposition of the unity of electricity and magnetism, see Schwartz, Classical Electrodynamics. It is more advanced than Purcell, but like it is written by a Nobel prize winner and is both intuitive and physical. It is a slim book that is intended to provide insights rather than covering the whole range of topics found in Griffiths. It is available inexpensively from Dover.
 
Second Jorriss's recommendation of Purcell.
 
I third Jorriss's reccomendation. =D
 
Thanks.
 
I like Dugdale's Essentials of Electromagnetism. It starts from Maxwell's equations as the big picture, then discusses the conditions under which eg. electrostatics or circuit theory are a excellent approximations.
 
Last edited:
Look at Franklin, "Classical Electromagnetism".
It is a graduate text, but gives a good math background, and fills in the steps.
 
I did my undergrad EM with Reitz' "Foundations of Electromagnetic Theory". I liked it, it's older than Griffiths' but the newer editions cover practically all of the same topics.

If you're looking for PGRE preparation, I'd suggest you work through the exams first and see what your weaknesses in EM are, then go grab one of those 1000 problems in E&M books and work through problems.
 
  • #10
Wangsness text is much better than Griffiths...
 
  • #11
Dr Transport said:
Wangsness text is much better than Griffiths...

Generally but it depends on the chapter, but I do like Wangsness, my professor's using it for E&M now; Shadowitz is another text that's pretty good.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
15K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
711
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
29K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K