Recommendation for Quantum Mechanics book

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around recommendations for books on quantum mechanics suitable for self-study, particularly with a focus on mathematical aspects. Participants share various titles and express their opinions on the suitability of these books for someone with a strong mathematical background but limited formal physics education.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks a quantum mechanics book that emphasizes mathematical concepts, given their background in linear algebra and functional analysis.
  • Another participant lists several books recommended by t'Hooft, including titles by W. Greiner, R. Shankar, and Cohen-Tannoudji.
  • A suggestion is made for "Lectures on quantum theory: mathematical and structural foundations" by Chris Isham, along with the idea of reading it alongside a standard introductory textbook like Griffiths.
  • Another participant recommends "Mathematical Concepts of Quantum Mechanics" by Stephen J. Gustafson and Israel Michael Sigal as a suitable option.
  • A participant mentions a book by PCW Davies that is described as accessible and quick to read.
  • Ballentine's book is noted as a good resource, though one participant cautions that it may not be suitable as a first book.
  • Another participant expresses a strong preference against Griffiths, suggesting it lacks mathematical and physical satisfaction, while recommending Feynman's Lectures as a better alternative.
  • It is noted that someone with a solid mathematical background could potentially use Dirac's book without prior physics knowledge.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a variety of opinions on the recommended books, with some agreeing on certain titles while others contest the suitability of specific recommendations, particularly Griffiths. No consensus is reached on a single best book.

Contextual Notes

Participants' recommendations depend on their individual experiences and preferences, which may not align with the needs of all learners. The discussion reflects a range of perspectives on the balance between mathematical rigor and physical intuition in quantum mechanics texts.

logarithmic
Messages
103
Reaction score
0
Can someone recommend me a book for self-studying quantum mechanics, just for personal interest.

I'm studying math, but not physics.

So I'm looking for something with a bit more of a mathematical focus. I'm very knowledgeable in linear algebra, and also know about Hilbert spaces and some functional analysis in general.

My physics knowledge is OK, but I've never had any formal instruction in university level physics, although I'm well-aware the general ideas of QM, although not the mathematical details, which is what I hope to learn.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Those are the books recommended by t'Hooft for self study:

# Quantum Mechanics - an Introduction, 4th ed. - W. Greiner
# R. Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics, Plenum
# Quantum Mechanics - Symmetries 2nd ed. - W. Greiner, B. Muller
# Quantum Mechanics - Vol 1&2 - Cohen-Tannoudji
# J.J. Sakurai, Advanced Quantum Mechanics, Addison-Wesley
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Joker93
Based on what you said I think "Lectures on quantum theory: mathematical and structural foundations" by Chris Isham would be the best choice. It might be a good idea to also get one of the standard introductory textbooks (e.g. Griffiths) and read both at the same time. By the way, there are lots of threads like this one, so you can check them out too.
 
I really like the book mentioned by Fredrik. Another possibility is Mathematical Concepts of Quantum Mechanics by Stephen J. Gustafson and Israel Michael Sigal,

.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Last edited by a moderator:
My top recomendation:
Introductory Quantum Mechanics-Liboff


I also have to second Greiner's book. Shanker's Principals of Quantum Mechanics is also good. However, I could NEVER recommend Griffiths (unlike everyone else on PF), as it is unsatisfying both mathematically and physically. Feynman's Lectures on PHysics, Vol. III is better
 
If your math is good, you can use Dirac without knowing any other physics.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K