Undergrad Reconciling alpha particle mass

Click For Summary
Alpha particles, which are identical to helium nuclei, have a mass of 4.001506 u, while helium-4 nuclei have a mass of 4.0026032 u, leading to confusion over the discrepancy. The difference in mass is attributed to the inclusion of electrons and energy considerations in atomic mass versus nuclear mass. Reliable sources are crucial for accurate data, especially when distinguishing between atomic and nuclear mass, as many sources do not clarify this distinction. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using trusted references like government or academic institutions for precise measurements. Ultimately, verifying the type of mass reported is essential for accurate calculations in nuclear binding energy.
ezfzx
Messages
50
Reaction score
14
Ugh ... I remember there was a reason ... but forgot what it was.
So here's 3 bits of information gathered from dozens of sources, textbooks, official sites:
  1. Alpha particles are identical to Helium nuclei.
  2. Alpha particle mass = 4.001506 u
  3. helium-4 nuclei mass = 4.0026032 u
OK, so ... why aren't they the same?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You sure about bit 3 ? Isn't that the isotope mass instead of the nucleus mass ? So 2 electrons minus some energy heavier ?
 
BvU said:
Isn't that the isotope mass instead of the nucleus mass ?
You are referring to the atomic mass, but yes, it is.
 
To make a more explicit hint: find the difference between the two masses, convert to kg, and divide by 2. Does the resulting number look familiar?
 
jtbell said:
convert to kg
I will convert to keV/c2 if you don't mind ... :rolleyes:
 
Orodruin said:
You are referring to the atomic mass
Considered it a reasonable term, since the atomic mass is normally an average over isotopes.
 
He has only one stable isotope and 3) is the atomic mass, not nuclear.
 
mathman said:
He has only one stable isotope and 3) is the atomic mass, not nuclear.
Helium 3 is stable and naturally occurring.
 
OK, so the extra mass is the electrons.
That's fine. But that extra mass gets tacked on when whenever I go searching for the mass of the He-4 "nucleus".
Every source seems to ignore the fact that I'm asking for the "nucleus".
If I'm building nuclear "binding energy" questions, I need reliable numbers.
If the source isn't specific about "atomic" vs. "nuclear" mass ... or worse ... if the source is listed in response to my specific search for "nuclear mass", it can be a little frustrating. I can compare He-4 to an alpha, but what about all the other elements?

I guess the point of the story is to get values from a reliable source.

Readers: What is your favorite reliable source? U.S.Gov? Cern? Stanford? chemicalelements.com?
 
  • #10
ezfzx said:
But that extra mass gets tacked on when whenever I go searching for the mass of the He-4 "nucleus".
You also found the mass of the nucleus.
Just make sure you check which value is given in a source. A proper source will tell you that.
 
  • #11
mfb said:
A proper source will tell you that.

My point exactly.
 
  • #12
Kids ... don't get your data from the back of a truck in a dark alley!
 
  • Like
Likes BvU and Orodruin

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K