• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products Here!

Rectangular finite potential well problem

  • Thread starter fluidistic
  • Start date
  • #1
fluidistic
Gold Member
3,655
101

Homework Statement


An electron enters in a finite rectangular potential well of length 4 angstroms. When the entering electrons have a kinetic energy of 0.7 eV they can travel through the region without having any reflection. Use this information to calculate the depth of the potential well.


Homework Equations


Not sure because I don't know if the kinetic energy of the electron is greater or lesser than the potential well.
I know that inside the well, [itex]\Psi _{II}(x)= C \sin (kx)+ D \cos (kx)[/itex]. I also know the form of the wave function outside the well (thanks to https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=540406&page=3) but I don't have the normalization, etc. I tried to search in google, wikipedia and hyperphysics and can't find the whole detailed solution.
I was thinking of calculating the flux of probability (I need the exact wavefunctions, normalized) in order to calculate the coefficient of transmission.

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm confused. I don't know how to tackle the problem, too many unknowns to me.
Any tip is appreciated.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
fluidistic
Gold Member
3,655
101
Ah I think I just realized how to solve the problem.
The electron has a greater kinetic energy that the potential well.
The coefficient of transmission is the one given by a barrier of potential when the energy of the particle exceed the potential barrier.
It is worth [itex]T=\frac{1}{1+ \frac{V_0 ^2 \sin ^2 (k_1 a)}{4E(E-V_0)}}[/itex] where [itex]k_1 = \sqrt { \frac{2m(V_0-E)}{\hbar ^2}}[/itex]. But unfortunately [itex]k_1[/itex] is complex.
So I set T=1 and I try to solve for [itex]V_0[/itex]... but this doesn't go well. This gives me [itex]V_0=0[/itex].
By the way I used the formula given in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rectangular_potential_barrier#Analysis_of_the_obtained_expressions.
Does someone understand better than me what's going on?
 
  • #3
fluidistic
Gold Member
3,655
101
Hmm, I've watched the first part of and he reaches a slightly different result than wikipedia for the transmission coefficient.
His [itex]k_1[/itex] is worth [itex]\sqrt {\frac{2m (E-V_0)}{\hbar ^2} }[/itex].
So for my exercise, I must solve for [itex]V_0[/itex] and [itex]n=1[/itex] in the expression a [itex]\sqrt {\frac{2m (E-V_0)}{\hbar ^2}}=n \pi[/itex]. I've checked out the units, all seems to work.
When I plug and chug the given values for the problem, I reach that [itex]V_0\approx -1.65 eV[/itex] or [itex]-1.6 eV[/itex] if I round correctly.
Can someone check out my work? That would after all make wikipedia "slightly wrong" for a formula.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Related Threads on Rectangular finite potential well problem

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
699
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
13K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
718
Replies
2
Views
2K
Top