Rectangular Plate SHM Time Period

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a rectangular plate suspended from a ceiling by two parallel strings, exploring the time period of simple harmonic motion (SHM) when the plate is displaced. The discussion centers around the dynamics of the plate's center of mass (CM) and the forces acting on it, particularly in relation to the angles formed by the strings with the vertical.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are examining the correct orientation of the plate during motion and whether the CM moves along an arc. Questions arise about the implications of the strings' inextensibility and the forces acting on the plate when displaced.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively questioning assumptions about the motion of the CM and the nature of the forces involved. Some have suggested that the plate does not rotate about its CM, while others are exploring the implications of different tensions in the strings. There is a productive exchange regarding the geometry of the motion and the characteristics of the circular path of the CM.

Contextual Notes

There is ongoing uncertainty regarding the exact dynamics of the system, particularly whether the tensions in the strings are equal and how this affects the motion of the plate. The discussion reflects a mix of correct reasoning and speculative thoughts, with participants encouraged to clarify their understanding of the physical setup.

  • #31
There will be an unbalanced torque (counterclockwise) about the CM .Just as the plate rotates,the tension T2 goes to zero , ie. String 2 becomes slack .

Right ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Yes. There will be a "critical angle" θc such that T2 = 0 when θ = θc. The net torque about the CM will still be zero at this angle. But once θ > θc, string 2 will have become slack and there will be a nonzero CCW torque about the CM due to T1. Then the plate rotates and the motion is more complicated.

You can see that if the plate were narrow horizontally and long vertically, then θc would be very small.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #33
Thanks for the insight .

Does finding the center of the circle require a bit of guesswork on our part ?

I first thought of the blue dot as the center .Found the coordinates with ehild's guidance.Then manipulated the coordinates by shifting the origin from the blue dot.

Was there a more systematic way to think about the center of the arc ?
 
  • #34
The blue dot was the origin of the coordinate system. with respect to it, the coordinates of the CM were [Lsinθ , -(Lcosθ+a/2)]. That is, the X coordinate is X=Lsinθ, the y coordinate is Y=-Lcosθ-a/2: Lsinθ=X, -Lcosθ=Y+a/2. Square both equations and add them:

X2+(Y+a/2)2=L2.

You got the equation of the circle the CM moves along. The centre is (0;-a/2). The radius is L. What was the guesswork?

ehild
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #35
The radius of the arc of the CM must equal the radius of the arc of the point of attachment of one of the strings to the plate. Thus, the radius of the arc of the CM must be the same as the length of the string.

Recall from post #24:
If the plate doesn't rotate, then it must move in pure translation. Thus the trajectories of any two points of the plate are congruent.
 
  • #36
ehild said:
The blue dot was the origin of the coordinate system. with respect to it, the coordinates of the CM were [Lsinθ , -(Lcosθ+a/2)]. That is, the X coordinate is X=Lsinθ, the y coordinate is Y=-Lcosθ-a/2: Lsinθ=X, -Lcosθ=Y+a/2. Square both equations and add them:

X2+(Y+a/2)2=L2.

You got the equation of the circle the CM moves along. The centre is (0;-a/2). The radius is L. What was the guesswork?

ehild

Nice and simple. Thanks!

I didn't find the center ,the way you did . When I looked at the coordinates ,it struck to me that if I could shift the origin to (0,-a/2) ,that will do the trick .

That is the guesswork I was talking about .
 
Last edited:
  • #37
TSny said:
The radius of the arc of the CM must equal the radius of the arc of the point of attachment of one of the strings to the plate. Thus, the radius of the arc of the CM must be the same as the length of the string.

Nice!

Thank you very very much TSny and ehild .You both have been simply wonderful :smile:
 
  • #38
Intuition is very important, and you have that ability. But it should be checked and proved by systematic work, which might not be that nice.

I followed the method applied in high-school problems. 'Prove that something is a circle and find the centre and radius'.
TSny-s method is more intuitive and physical : The plate only translates - all its points move along the same curve , the point of any attachment with a string has to move along a circle of radius L, so does the CM.

ehild
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K