Recurrence relation for the Legendre functions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on deriving the recurrence relation for Legendre functions from Legendre's equation, specifically the equation (1-x²)y'' - 2xy' + l(l+1)y = 0. The solution is assumed in the form y = Σanxn, leading to a rearranged series that simplifies to Σ[(n+2)(n+1)an+2 - (n(n+1)-l(l+1))an]xn = 0. The key transformation from xn-2 to xn using an+2 is clarified through detailed differentiation of the assumed series solution, emphasizing the importance of collecting terms by their powers of x.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Legendre's equation and its significance in mathematical physics.
  • Familiarity with power series and their convergence properties.
  • Knowledge of differentiation techniques for series expansions.
  • Basic grasp of recurrence relations in mathematical analysis.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Legendre polynomials and their applications in physics.
  • Learn about the properties of orthogonal functions and their role in solving differential equations.
  • Explore advanced techniques in series solutions for differential equations.
  • Investigate the relationship between Legendre functions and spherical harmonics.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying differential equations, particularly those interested in special functions and their applications in theoretical physics.

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
My book wants to find solutions to Legendre's equation:

(1-x2)y'' - 2xy' 0 l(l+1)y = 0 (1)

By assuming a solution of the form:

y = Ʃanxn , the sum going from 0->∞ (2)

Now by plugging (2) into (1) one finds:

Ʃ[n(n-1)anxn-2-n(n-1)anxn - 2nanxn +
l(l+1)anxn = 0

Rearranging my book writes this as:

Ʃ[(n+2)(n+1)an+2 - (n(n+1)-l(l+1))an]xn = 0

I can't understand the emphasized bit. How did we go from xn-2 to xn using an+2?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
aaaa202 said:
My book wants to find solutions to Legendre's equation:

(1-x2)y'' - 2xy' 0 l(l+1)y = 0 (1)

By assuming a solution of the form:

y = Ʃanxn , the sum going from 0->∞ (2)

Now by plugging (2) into (1) one finds:

Ʃ[n(n-1)anxn-2-n(n-1)anxn - 2nanxn +
l(l+1)anxn = 0

Rearranging my book writes this as:

Ʃ[(n+2)(n+1)an+2 - (n(n+1)-l(l+1))an]xn = 0

I can't understand the emphasized bit. How did we go from xn-2 to xn using an+2?

Until you get the hang of these things the best policy is to write it out in a bit more detail: from [itex]y = a_0 + a_1 x + a_2 x^2 + \cdots + a_n x^n + \cdots,[/itex] we have
[tex]y' = a_1 + 2 a_2 x + 3a_3 x^2 + \cdots + (n+1) a_{n+1} x^n + \cdots, \\<br /> y'' = 2a_2 + 3\cdot 2 a_3 x + 4 \cdot 3 a_4 x^2 + \cdots + (n+2)(n+1) a_{n+2} x^n + \cdots.[/tex] So now you can write out the terms of
[tex](1-x^2) y'' - 2xy' + l(l+1) y,[/tex] collect all the terms in [itex]x^0, \: x^2, \: x^2, \ldots, x^n, \ldots[/itex] and require them all to be zero.

RGV
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K