Redshift of non-comoving galaxy

  • Thread starter Thread starter wabbit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Galaxy Redshift
Click For Summary
In a flat FRW universe, the redshift observed by a comoving observer for a source moving radially at velocity v is derived from both Doppler effects and the expansion of the universe. The calculation shows that the observed wavelength is influenced by the source's velocity and the scale factor at emission and observation times. The final formula combines these effects, resulting in a total redshift expression that accounts for both the Doppler shift and the expansion shift. The discussion emphasizes the importance of separating the problem into two parts: calculating the frequency or wavelength for a nearby observer and then applying the scale factor for distant observers. This approach clarifies the relationship between motion and cosmic expansion in redshift calculations.
wabbit
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,284
Reaction score
208

Homework Statement


In a flat FRW universe, for a source moving radially at velocity v (at emission time) relative to the local comoving frame, what is the redshift observed by a comoving observer?

Homework Equations


##c=1##
Proper time to cosmological time ratio ##\frac{d\tau}{dt}=\sqrt{1-v^2}##
Redshift of comoving source ##\frac{\lambda_{obs}}{\lambda_{em}}=\frac{a(t_{obs})}{a(t_{em})}##
Note : Abusing terminology here, the "redshifts" here are quoted as ##S=z+1## intead of ##z##.

The Attempt at a Solution


Based of the infinitesimal motion of the source and on light paths, I get $$\frac{\lambda_{obs}}{\lambda_{em}^{com}}=(1+v)\frac{a(t_{obs})}{a(t_{em})}$$
This is the redshift between ##\lambda_{em}^{com}## measured at emission time in a comoving frame, and ##\lambda_{obs}## measured by the comoving receiver.
And combining this with ##\frac{\lambda_{em}^{com}}{\lambda_{em}}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-v^2}}##, the total redshift is
$$\frac{\lambda_{obs}}{\lambda_{em}}=\sqrt{\frac{1+v}{1-v}}\frac{a(t_{obs})}{a(t_{em})}$$

Can someone confirm if this correct, and if not point to the error? This is not exactly homework, rather a calculation I did since I wondered about that case, and I didn't find the relevant formula online to check against.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you can split the problem in two parts. Find the frequency or wavelength observed by a comoving observer at (nearly) the same place, then apply the usual scale factor for distant observers. And the result is exactly what you got if the object is moving away.
 
Thanks - Indeed, I didn't see it this way, the result is just a Doppler shift times an expansion shift, that's a much better way to get it than what I did !
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
10K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
8K