Reference for diamagnetic vs paramagnetic

JustinLevy
Messages
882
Reaction score
1
I am not a chemist, so I have a feeling I'm going about searching for the wrong key words or something.

What I want is a table of Fe+2 and Fe+3 compounds in solution (ie. different ligands like CO, CN-, etc.), listing each compound as paramagnetic or diamagnetic. I've searched for a nice chemistry review article that may have this, but this seems too "old" of information so I can't find anything good.

Maybe a good textbook? Or maybe I just don't know how to search for articles well without getting all kinds of noise to sift through.

Please, can anyone help?
Anyone take inorganic chem and can check their textbook, or recommend one?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try the CRC handbook
 
Fe3+ has an odd number of electrons, so at least one electron will be unpaired.
 
nbo10 said:
Try the CRC handbook
I looked through the online one which allowed searching. Found some iron compounds under a table for "MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY". I didn't think of looking for that. Maybe with that keyword I can find some more info online, but I'm still struggling to find a huge list. The CRC one was mostly limited to halogen salts. So they didn't even have CO or CN- ligands listed, let alone some common bidentite ones.

PhaseShifter said:
Fe3+ has an odd number of electrons, so at least one electron will be unpaired.
Some ionic complexes have two metallic centers, and so I have been warned that there are cases which are surprisingly diamagnetic. Also, apparently most Fe+2 compounds still have unpaired electrons, unless the ligands are 'just right' or something ... I wish I understood this better. Google books spits out snippets from some chemistry textbooks, so maybe I'll hit up the chemistry library later. But there has got to be some good information on the internet somewhere, if only I knew how to search for it better.
 
JustinLevy said:
Also, apparently most Fe+2 compounds still have unpaired electrons, unless the ligands are 'just right' or something ... I wish I understood this better. Google books spits out snippets from some chemistry textbooks, so maybe I'll hit up the chemistry library later. But there has got to be some good information on the internet somewhere, if only I knew how to search for it better.
d electron spin states

Keep in mind Fe2+ is d6, while F3+ is d5.

also, a tetrahedral ligand field will result in two lower energy orbitals and three higher energy, as opposed to three lower and two higher for octahedral complexes.
 
Last edited:
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top